Literature DB >> 23927128

The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Kevin J Reilly1, Kathleen E Dougherty.   

Abstract

The perturbation of acoustic features in a speaker's auditory feedback elicits rapid compensatory responses that demonstrate the importance of auditory feedback for control of speech output. The current study investigated whether responses to a perturbation of speech auditory feedback vary depending on the importance of the perturbed feature to perception of the vowel being produced. Auditory feedback of speakers' first formant frequency (F1) was shifted upward by 130 mels in randomly selected trials during the speakers' production of consonant-vowel-consonant words containing either the vowel /Λ/ or the vowel /ɝ/. Although these vowels exhibit comparable F1 frequencies, the contribution of F1 to perception of /Λ/ is greater than its contribution to perception of /ɝ/. Compensation to the F1 perturbation was observed during production of both vowels, but compensatory responses during /Λ/ occurred at significantly shorter latencies and exhibited significantly larger magnitudes than compensatory responses during /ɝ/. The finding that perturbation of vowel F1 during /Λ/ and /ɝ/ yielded compensatory differences that mirrored the contributions of F1 to perception of these vowels indicates that some portion of feedback control is weighted toward monitoring and preservation of acoustic cues for speech perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927128      PMCID: PMC3745484          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell; Margaret Denny; Harlan Lane; Frank Guenther; Melanie L Matthies; Mark Tiede; Jennell Vick; Majid Zandipour; Ellen Burton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  THE QUANTUM OF SENSORY DISCRIMINATION.

Authors:  S S Stevens; J Volkmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1940-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production.

Authors:  B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Integration of auditory and somatosensory error signals in the neural control of speech movements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Vincent L Gracco; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Speech production as state feedback control.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria I Ventura; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Kevin J Reilly; Erin Archibald; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Chelsea Pettibone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Tiffany Voon; Monique Tardif; Dante Cilento; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Sara-Ching Chao; Lacee C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; K G Munhall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.