Literature DB >> 18322088

Specificity of speech motor learning.

Stéphanie Tremblay1, Guillaume Houle, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

The idea that the brain controls movement using a neural representation of limb dynamics has been a dominant hypothesis in motor control research for well over a decade. Speech movements offer an unusual opportunity to test this proposal by means of an examination of transfer of learning between utterances that are to varying degrees matched on kinematics. If speech learning results in a generalizable dynamics representation, then, at the least, learning should transfer when similar movements are embedded in phonetically distinct utterances. We tested this idea using three different pairs of training and transfer utterances that substantially overlap kinematically. We find that, with these stimuli, speech learning is highly contextually sensitive and fails to transfer even to utterances that involve very similar movements. Speech learning appears to be extremely local, and the specificity of learning is incompatible with the idea that speech control involves a generalized dynamics representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18322088      PMCID: PMC6671181          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4196-07.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning.

Authors:  Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Lara Richer; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-18

6.  OroSTIFF: Face-referenced measurement of perioral stiffness in health and disease.

Authors:  Shin-Ying Chu; Steven M Barlow; Douglas Kieweg; Jaehoon Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Integration of auditory and somatosensory error signals in the neural control of speech movements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Vincent L Gracco; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Learning, attentional control, and action video games.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Task specificity in early oral motor development.

Authors:  Erin M Wilson; Jordan R Green; Yana Yunusova; Christopher A Moore
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.