Literature DB >> 2926004

Inhibiting the Lombard effect.

H L Pick1, G M Siegel, P W Fox, S R Garber, J K Kearney.   

Abstract

The Lombard effect is the tendency to increase one's vocal intensity in noise. The present study reports three experiments that test the robustness of the Lombard effect when speakers are given instructions and training with visual feedback to help suppress it. The Lombard effect was found to be extremely stable and robust. Instructions alone had little influence on the response to the noise among untrained speakers. When visual feedback correlated with vocal intensity was presented, however, subjects could inhibit the Lombard response. Furthermore, the inhibition remained after the visual feedback was removed. The data are interpreted as indicating that the Lombard response is largely automatic and not ordinarily under volitional control. When subjects do learn to suppress the effect, they seem to do so by changing overall vocal level rather than their specific response to the noise.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926004     DOI: 10.1121/1.397561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Curio; G Neuloh; J Numminen; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Changes to respiratory mechanisms during speech as a result of different cues to increase loudness.

Authors:  Jessica E Huber; Bharath Chandrasekaran; John J Wolstencroft
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-02-10

3.  Effects of increasing sound pressure level on lip and jaw movement parameters and consistency in young adults.

Authors:  Jessica E Huber; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Effects of utterance length and vocal loudness on speech breathing in older adults.

Authors:  Jessica E Huber
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 1.931

5.  Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ewen N MacDonald; David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modification of spectral features by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Ninad B Kothari; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neural correlates of the lombard effect in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Increased vocal intensity due to the Lombard effect in speakers with Parkinson's disease: simultaneous laryngeal and respiratory strategies.

Authors:  Elaine T Stathopoulos; Jessica E Huber; Kelly Richardson; Jennifer Kamphaus; Devan DeCicco; Meghan Darling; Katrina Fulcher; Joan E Sussman
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.