Literature DB >> 21234562

Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Luis Pulido1, Sridhar R Rachala, Miguel E Cabanela.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular revision is probably the most difficult aspect of hip reconstructive surgery. Although the majority of acetabular revisions can be performed using an uncemented hemispherical acetabular device with ancillary fixation, patients with severe acetabular deficiencies and poor bone quality require more complex alternatives for revision. The limitations of traditional cementless acetabular implants has promoted the development of improved methods of fixation and revision techniques. Highly porous metals have been introduced for clinical use in arthroplasty surgery over the last decade. Their higher porosity and surface friction are ideal for acetabular revision, optimising biological fixation. The use of trabecular metal cups in acetabular revision has yielded excellent clinical results.
PURPOSE: This review focuses on the use of cementless implants for acetabular revision. The use of trabecular metal cups, augments, jumbo cups, oblong cups, cages, and structural grafting are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21234562      PMCID: PMC3032100          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1198-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  45 in total

1.  Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stuart Goodman; Hillary Saastamoinen; Nadav Shasha; Allan Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Cementless acetabular revision with the Harris-Galante porous prosthesis. Results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Brian R Hallstrom; Gregory J Golladay; David A Vittetoe; William H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  S A Lie; L I Havelin; O N Furnes; L B Engesaeter; S E Vollset
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

4.  Acetabular cages: a ladder across a melting pond.

Authors:  Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A L Whaley; D J Berry; W S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; C J Sutherland; R T Trousdale; C W Colwell; H P Chandler; D Ayres; A A Yashar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; D G Lewallen; A D Hanssen; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J E Templeton; J J Callaghan; D D Goetz; P M Sullivan; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report.

Authors:  J A Bojescul; J S Xenos; John J Callaghan; C G Savory
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  41 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Press-fit cementless acetabular fixation with and without screws.

Authors:  Sheng-Hui Ni; Lei Guo; Tian-Long Jiang; Jie Zhao; Yan-Gang Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effect of design on the initial stability of press-fit cups in the presence of acetabular rim defects: experimental evaluation of the effect of adding circumferential fins.

Authors:  Wolfgang O Huber; Philip C Noble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The value of computed tomography based navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Kuroda; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Shin Watanabe; Shintaro Iwai; Fujita Kenji; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Daisuke Inoue; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Total Hip Arthroplasty, state of the art for the 21st century.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Courpied; Jacques Henri Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  CORR Insights(®): Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?

Authors:  Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Double acetabular wall--a misleading point for hip arthroplasty: an anatomical, radiological, clinical study.

Authors:  Firooz Madadi; Hamed Yazdanshenas; Firoozeh Madadi; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.