Literature DB >> 22273707

[Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

S Winkler1, F-X Köck, C Baier, H-R Springorum, A Beifuss, P Lechler, J Grifka, J Schaumburger.   

Abstract

According to current prognostic studies the numbers of revision operations of hip and knee arthroplasty will increase worldwide. As many patients undergo several revisions and become older at the same time, orthopedic surgeons will have to cope with vast bony defects during operations. The introduction of highly porous metals as surface layer or metal augments has facilitated primary stabilization of prostheses. Short and mid-term results of these new products are promising. New developments in coatings, such as cationic antimicrobial peptides represent new alternatives for antibacterial therapy of periprosthetic infections and increase osteointegration of prosthesis components. Furthermore, the new revision systems have a modular design and can be individually adapted to the patient's bony conditions during operations. In most cases this can be done without cement or in a hybrid technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273707     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1869-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  33 in total

1.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments.

Authors:  Jonathan P Van Kleunen; Gwo-Chin Lee; Peter W Lementowski; Charles L Nelson; Jonathan P Garino
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty acetabular cups to porous tantalum components: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Mariano Fernández-Fairen; Antonio Murcia; Agustin Blanco; Antonio Meroño; Antonio Murcia; Jorge Ballester
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcome comparison with and without the use of femoral head structural allograft.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Donald S Garbuz; Luke Pugh; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Reduced femoral component subsidence with improved impaction grafting at revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D W Howie; S A Callary; M A McGee; N C Russell; L B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James L Howard; Jeremy Kudera; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques.

Authors:  George J Haidukewych; Arlen Hanssen; Richard Dickey Jones
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Comparison of one and two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty complicated by infection: a Markov expected-utility decision analysis.

Authors:  Christopher F Wolf; Ning Yan Gu; Jason N Doctor; Paul A Manner; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Prosthesis loosening].

Authors:  J Schaumburger; S Winkler; M Handel; J Grifka; C Baier
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.372

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.