Wolfgang O Huber1, Philip C Noble. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Herz Jesu Hospital Vienna, Baumgasse 20A, 1030, Vienna, Austria, dr.wolfgang.huber@aon.at.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This experimental study was undertaken to examine the fixation characteristics of a six-finned acetabular cup in both primary and revision arthroplasty in comparison with two other commonly used cup designs without fins. METHODS: All three cup designs (Ananova® [Intraplant], Plasmacup® NSC [Aesculap]; Exceed ABT™ [Biomet]) were implanted into validated models of normal and revision acetabula. The defect models were designed to simulate a dorso-cranial rim defect of 90° width and 10 mm in depth (moderate rim defect) and a dorso-cranial rim defect of 130° width and 15 mm in depth (severe rim defect). The fixation strength of the three cup designs was tested by cyclically edge-loading the implanted cups using a mechanical testing machine. RESULTS: The six-finned Ananova implant exhibited greater resistance to foam-cup interface motion than both the Plasmacup and Exceed ABT implants. The largest average differences were observed in the resistance to ultimate spin-out, with Ananova outperforming Exceed ABT and Plasmacup by 26% and 17% in the moderate and by 36% and 38% in the severe defect models, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The six-finned Ananova cup was significantly more resistant to edge loading both in the normal acetabulum and in acetabula with moderate to severe dorso-cranial rim defects than cup designs without fins, indicating that it may cover a wider range of clinical indications than conventional press-fit cups and provide clinicians with the confidence that, in primary and simple revision arthroplasty, adequate fixation strength can be obtained.
PURPOSE: This experimental study was undertaken to examine the fixation characteristics of a six-finned acetabular cup in both primary and revision arthroplasty in comparison with two other commonly used cup designs without fins. METHODS: All three cup designs (Ananova® [Intraplant], Plasmacup® NSC [Aesculap]; Exceed ABT™ [Biomet]) were implanted into validated models of normal and revision acetabula. The defect models were designed to simulate a dorso-cranial rim defect of 90° width and 10 mm in depth (moderate rim defect) and a dorso-cranial rim defect of 130° width and 15 mm in depth (severe rim defect). The fixation strength of the three cup designs was tested by cyclically edge-loading the implanted cups using a mechanical testing machine. RESULTS: The six-finned Ananova implant exhibited greater resistance to foam-cup interface motion than both the Plasmacup and Exceed ABT implants. The largest average differences were observed in the resistance to ultimate spin-out, with Ananova outperforming Exceed ABT and Plasmacup by 26% and 17% in the moderate and by 36% and 38% in the severe defect models, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The six-finned Ananova cup was significantly more resistant to edge loading both in the normal acetabulum and in acetabula with moderate to severe dorso-cranial rim defects than cup designs without fins, indicating that it may cover a wider range of clinical indications than conventional press-fit cups and provide clinicians with the confidence that, in primary and simple revision arthroplasty, adequate fixation strength can be obtained.
Authors: Martin Kaipel; Anton Prenner; Sebastian Bachl; Sebastian Farr; Günter Sinz Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 1.704