Literature DB >> 15118045

Cementless acetabular revision with the Harris-Galante porous prosthesis. Results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Brian R Hallstrom1, Gregory J Golladay, David A Vittetoe, William H Harris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Revisions of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty have a higher rate of complications, particularly loosening and dislocation, than do primary procedures. The purpose of this study, in which the results of a consecutive series of revisions performed with the Harris-Galante Porous acetabular component by a single surgeon were evaluated at an average of twelve years, was to quantify the complications and outcomes of acetabular revision.
METHODS: Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated to assess loosening, lysis, radiolucencies, and trochanteric union in 188 hips (170 patients) treated between 1984 and 1990. One hundred and twenty-two hips in 110 patients were followed for at least ten years, which was required for inclusion in the study. Thirty-one patients (thirty-six hips) died less than ten years postoperatively, and twenty-nine patients (thirty hips) were lost to or refused to return for follow-up.
RESULTS: The average Harris hip score was 78 points at an average of 12.5 years after revision, which was a 29-point improvement compared with the preoperative score. The rate of repeat revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular shell was 4% (five of 122). The rate of repeat revision of the shell for any reason was 15% (eighteen of 122). Eight unrevised sockets were loose radiographically, for a total rate of aseptic loosening of 11% (thirteen of 122).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that most acetabular revisions with this cementless hemispherical socket were successful. Few structural grafts and no cages were used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118045     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George W Fryhofer; Sireesh Ramesh; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-02

7.  Cementless jumbo cups for revision of failed Furlong prosthesis. A case series.

Authors:  Ahmed Salem Eid; Ahmed Kotb; Waleed Elshabrawy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-11

8.  Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.

Authors:  Pascal Mueller Greber; Isabella Manzoni; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.