Literature DB >> 10693562

Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

D J Berry1, C J Sutherland, R T Trousdale, C W Colwell, H P Chandler, D Ayres, A A Yashar.   

Abstract

Thirty-eight oblong bilobed noncustom uncemented, porous-coated titanium acetabular components were used to reconstruct failed hip arthroplasties with large superior segmental acetabular bone deficiencies. No structural bone grafts were used. All patients were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean, 3 years) after the operation. One patient (whose socket rested primarily on a structural bone graft from a previous procedure) had revision surgery for acetabular loosening. No other patients have had revision surgery or had another ipsilateral hip operation. At latest followup, 35 patients had no or mild pain and two patients had moderate pain. Two implants migrated more than 2 mm in the first year, then stabilized. On the latest radiographs, two implants had bead shedding, but there was no measurable migration or change in position. For selected patients with large superolateral acetabular bone deficiencies, this implant facilitated a complex reconstruction, provided good clinical results, and showed satisfactory stability at early to midterm followup in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10693562     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Structural allograft and primary press-fit cup for severe acetabular deficiency. A minimum 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  F Traina; F Giardina; M De Clerico; A Toni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results.

Authors:  R Civinini; A Capone; C Carulli; M Villano; M I Gusso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Michael E Higgins; Joseph Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Pavel Sebena
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?

Authors:  Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Erin L Ruh; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Biological fixation of total hip arthroplasty: Facts and factors.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-15

8.  Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects.

Authors:  Thomas J Blumenfeld; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].

Authors:  S Fickert; S Pfeiffer; A Walter; K P Günther; W-C Witzleb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.