Literature DB >> 19277803

Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Dror Lakstein1, David Backstein, Oleg Safir, Yona Kosashvili, Allan E Gross.   

Abstract

Acetabular component revision in the context of large contained bone defects with less than 50% host bone contact traditionally have been treated with roof reinforcement or antiprotrusio cages. Trabecular Metal cups (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, IN) may offer a reasonable treatment alternative. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcome of this mode of treatment. We prospectively followed 53 hip revision acetabular arthroplasty procedures performed with Trabecular Metal cups for contained defects with 50% or less contact with native bone. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated for evidence of loosening or failure. Minimum followup was 24 months (average, 45 months; range, 24-71 months). Contact with host bone ranged from 0% to 50% (average, 19%). The mean postoperative Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score was 10.6 (range, 1-12), with a mean improvement of 5.2 (range, -4-10) compared to the preoperative score. Two failed cups (4%) were revised. Two additional cups (4%) had radiographic evidence of probable loosening. Complications included four dislocations and one sciatic nerve palsy. The data suggest treatment of cavitary defects with less than 50% host bone contact using Trabecular Metal cups, without structural support by augments or structural bone grafts, is a reasonable option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277803      PMCID: PMC2866921          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0772-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery.

Authors:  K J Saleh; J Holtzman; A Gafni; L Saleh; A Davis; S Resig; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stuart Goodman; Hillary Saastamoinen; Nadav Shasha; Allan Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  B W Schreurs; S B T Bolder; J W M Gardeniers; N Verdonschot; T J J H Slooff; R P H Veth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

4.  Restoration of acetabular bone loss 2005.

Authors:  Allan E Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Scott Sporer; Wayne Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G DeLee; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Acetabular preparation in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W A McGann; R B Welch; G D Picetti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Siegmeth; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Winston Y Kim; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Survivorship of monoblock trabecular metal cups in primary THA : midterm results.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Malizos; Konstantinos Bargiotas; Loukia Papatheodorou; Michael Hantes; Theofilos Karachalios
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  W Y Kim; N V Greidanus; C P Duncan; B A Masri; D S Garbuz
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  33 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul T H Lee; Guy Raz; Oleg A Safir; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

5.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

6.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.