Literature DB >> 21156870

Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Alex Bahrami Balani1, David Soto, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

We examined two forms of top-down effects on visual selection: (1) information held in working memory (WM) and (2) the semantic relations between targets and distractors. We found that items held in WM affected search for a different target. This WM-based interference effect generalized across different exemplars, even though participants could remember the specific exemplar on the trial. This argues against a memory top-up account of performance. In addition, there was interference from distractors that were not held in WM but were semantically related to the target. The effects of WM capture and the effects of capture by a distractor related to the target combined additively. The data suggest that task-irrelevant information in WM and task-relevant templates for targets compete separately for selection. The implications for understanding top-down processes in search are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21156870     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  29 in total

1.  Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.

Authors:  J Hodsoll; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

2.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Moores; Liana Laiti; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Preview search and contextual cuing.

Authors:  John P Hodsoll; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

Authors:  R Houtkamp; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Stressing the mind: the effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-07

7.  A case of integrative visual agnosia.

Authors:  M J Riddoch; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; E K Miller; J Duncan; R Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Attentional control and competition between episodic representations.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Anna Schubö; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-02

Review 2.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Saved by a log: how do humans perform hybrid visual and memory search?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05-22

4.  Automatic guidance of attention during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Katharina N Seidl-Rathkopf; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

6.  The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-03-24

7.  Long-lasting semantic interference effects in object naming are not necessarily conceptually mediated.

Authors:  Emma Riley; Katie L McMahon; Greig de Zubicaray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-07

8.  Exploring biased attention towards body-related stimuli and its relationship with body awareness.

Authors:  Gerardo Salvato; Gabriele De Maio; Gabriella Bottini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Training modulates memory-driven capture.

Authors:  Edyta Sasin; Florian Sense; Mark Nieuwenstein; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.157

10.  Guidance of attention by information held in working memory.

Authors:  Marissa Ortiz Calleja; Anina N Rich
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.