Literature DB >> 16634680

The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

R Houtkamp1, P R Roelfsema.   

Abstract

Paying attention to an object facilitates its storage in working memory. The authors investigate whether the opposite is also true: whether items in working memory influence the deployment of attention. Participants performed a search for a prespecified target while they held another item in working memory. In some trials this memory item was present in the search display as a distractor. Such a distractor has no effect on search time if the search target is in the display. In that case, the item in working memory is unlikely to be selected as a target for an eye movement, and if the eyes do land on it, fixation duration is short. In the absence of the target, however, there is a small but significant effect of the memory item on search time. The authors conclude that the target for visual search has a special status in working memory that allows it to guide attention. Guidance of attention by other items in working memory is much weaker and can be observed only if the search target is not present in the display.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634680     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  41 in total

1.  Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Authors:  Alex Bahrami Balani; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

2.  Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-07-18

3.  Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control over Working Memory Capture of Attention.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Mathilde M Ooi; Tobias Egner; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time.

Authors:  Roos Houtkamp; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-07-30

5.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Alexander Pollatsek; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

Review 7.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The relationship between visual working memory and attention: retention of precise colour information in the absence of effects on perceptual selection.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Seongmin Hwang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Frontal-medial temporal interactions mediate transitions among representational states in short-term memory.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; John Jonides
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.