Literature DB >> 24661054

The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.

Corbin A Cunningham1, Jeremy M Wolfe2.   

Abstract

In hybrid search, observers search for any of several possible targets in a visual display containing distracting items and, perhaps, a target. Wolfe (2012) found that response times (RTs) in such tasks increased linearly with increases in the number of items in the display. However, RT increased linearly with the log of the number of items in the memory set. In earlier work, all items in the memory set were unique instances (e.g., this apple in this pose). Typical real-world tasks involve more broadly defined sets of stimuli (e.g., any "apple" or, perhaps, "fruit"). The present experiments show how sets or categories of targets are handled in joint visual and memory search. In Experiment 1, searching for a digit among letters was not like searching for targets from a 10-item memory set, though searching for targets from an N-item memory set of arbitrary alphanumeric characters was like searching for targets from an N-item memory set of arbitrary objects. In Experiment 2, observers searched for any instance of N sets or categories held in memory. This hybrid search was harder than search for specific objects. However, memory search remained logarithmic. Experiment 3 illustrates the interaction of visual guidance and memory search when a subset of visual stimuli are drawn from a target category. Furthermore, we outline a conceptual model, supported by our results, defining the core components that would be necessary to support such categorical hybrid searches. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661054      PMCID: PMC4115034          DOI: 10.1037/a0036313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  60 in total

1.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Attention lights up new object representations before the old ones fade away.

Authors:  Paul S Khayat; Henk Spekreijse; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects.

Authors:  Sarah Walker; Paul Stafford; Greg Davis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Christopher Donkin; Mario Fific
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Recognition memory and attentional selection: serial scanning is not enough.

Authors:  B A Eriksen; C W Eriksen; J E Hoffman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  When categories collide: accumulation of information about multiple categories in rapid scene perception.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-09

8.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Visual search demands dictate reliance on working memory storage.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  27 in total

1.  Task-relevant perceptual features can define categories in visual memory too.

Authors:  Karla B Antonelli; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

2.  Lost in the supermarket: Quantifying the cost of partitioning memory sets in hybrid search.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

3.  Searching for the right word: Hybrid visual and memory search for words.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search.

Authors:  Nicole L Jardine; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Caroline Seidel; Jeremy Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-08-15

6.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Age doesn't matter much: hybrid visual and memory search is preserved in older adults.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2019-05-03

8.  A neural signature of rapid category-based target selection as a function of intra-item perceptual similarity, despite inter-item dissimilarity.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Zoe Pruitt; Megan Runkle; Gaia Scerif; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Avigael M Aizenman; Sage E P Boettcher; Matthew S Cain
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Searching while loaded: Visual working memory does not interfere with hybrid search efficiency but hybrid search uses working memory capacity.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Sage E P Boettcher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.