Literature DB >> 17563233

Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.

David Soto1, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that visual attention can be captured by stimuli matching the contents of working memory (WM). Here, the authors assessed the nature of the representation that mediates the guidance of visual attention from WM. Observers were presented with either verbal or visual primes (to hold in memory, Experiment 1; to verbalize, Experiment 2; or merely to attend, Experiment 3) and subsequently were required to search for a target among different distractors, each embedded within a colored shape. In half of the trials, an object in the search array matched the prime, but this object never contained the target. Despite this, search was impaired relative to a neutral baseline in which the prime and search displays did not match. An interesting finding is that verbal primes were effective in generating the effects, and verbalization of visual primes elicited similar effects to those elicited when primes were held in WM. However, the effects were absent when primes were only attended. The data suggest that there is automatic encoding into WM when items are verbalized and that verbal as well as visual WM can guide visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563233     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  50 in total

1.  Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Authors:  Alex Bahrami Balani; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

2.  Attention to future actions: the influence of instructed S-R versus S-S mappings on attentional control.

Authors:  Helen Tibboel; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-06

3.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Common and distinct neural regions for the guidance of selection by visuoverbal information held in memory: converging evidence from fMRI and rTMS.

Authors:  David Soto; Pia Rotshtein; John Hodsoll; Carmel Mevorach; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

8.  Haptic guidance of overt visual attention.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

10.  Incidental biasing of attention from visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.