Literature DB >> 16366794

Preview search and contextual cuing.

John P Hodsoll1, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of contextual cuing (M. M. Chun & Y. Jiang, 1998) within the preview paradigm (D. G. Watson & G. W. Humphreys, 1997). Contextual cuing was shown with a 10-item letter search but not with more crowded 20-item displays. However, contextual learning did occur in a preview procedure in which 10 preview items were followed by 10 new items. Repeating the new items alone did not generate contextual learning, but repeating the preview items alone did, as long as they had a consistent spatial relation with the target. This was not merely due to the onset of the preview items being associated with the target location. No learning effect took place with a preview of homogeneous items that competed less for selection with new stimuli. The results provide evidence for old items being processed in preview search and providing a context for subsequent search of new items. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366794     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  3 in total

1.  Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Authors:  Alex Bahrami Balani; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

2.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Attention dependency in implicit learning of repeated search context.

Authors:  Valeria Rausei; Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.