Literature DB >> 23444390

Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Geoffrey F Woodman1, Nancy B Carlisle, Robert M G Reinhart.   

Abstract

During the last decade one of the most contentious and heavily studied topics in the attention literature has been the role that working memory representations play in controlling perceptual selection. The hypothesis has been advanced that to have attention select a certain perceptual input from the environment, we only need to represent that item in working memory. Here we summarize the work indicating that the relationship between what representations are maintained in working memory and what perceptual inputs are selected is not so simple. First, it appears that attentional selection is also determined by high-level task goals that mediate the relationship between working memory storage and attentional selection. Second, much of the recent work from our laboratory has focused on the role of long-term memory in controlling attentional selection. We review recent evidence supporting the proposal that working memory representations are critical during the initial configuration of attentional control settings, but that after those settings are established long-term memory representations play an important role in controlling which perceptual inputs are selected by mechanisms of attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23444390      PMCID: PMC3590103          DOI: 10.1167/13.3.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  70 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-07-18

4.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Proactive interference as a function of time between tests.

Authors:  L R Peterson; A Gentile
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11

7.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  39 in total

1.  Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Attention's Accelerator.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Laura J McClenahan; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-04-07

4.  The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Localization and Elimination of Attentional Dysfunction in Schizophrenia During Visual Search.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Sohee Park; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Brett Bahle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.