Literature DB >> 21075019

RF Heating of MRI-Assisted Catheter Steering Coils for Interventional MRI.

Fabio Settecase1, Steven W Hetts, Alastair J Martin, Timothy P L Roberts, Anthony F Bernhardt, Lee Evans, Vincent Malba, Maythem Saeed, Ronald L Arenson, Walter Kucharzyk, Mark W Wilson.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was too assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiofrequency (RF)-related heating of conductive wire coils used in magnetically steerable endovascular catheters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-axis microcoil was fabricated onto a 1.8Fr catheter tip. In vitro testing was performed on a 1.5-T MRI system using an agarose gel-filled vessel phantom, a transmit-receive body RF coil, a steady-state free precession pulse sequence, and a fluoroptic thermometry system. Temperature was measured without simulated blood flow at varying distances from the magnet isocenter and at varying flip angles. Additional experiments were performed with laser-lithographed single-axis microcoil-tipped microcatheters in air and in a saline bath with varied grounding of the microcoil wires. Preliminary in vivo evaluation of RF heating was performed in pigs at 1.5 T with coil-tipped catheters in various positions in the common carotid arteries with steady-state free precession pulse sequence on and off and under physiologic-flow and zero-flow conditions.
RESULTS: In tissue-mimicking agarose gel, RF heating resulted in a maximal temperature increase of 0.35°C after 15 minutes of imaging, 15 cm from the magnet isocenter. For a single-axis microcoil, maximal temperature increases were 0.73°C to 1.91°C in air and 0.45°C to 0.55°C in saline. In vivo, delayed contrast-enhanced MRI revealed no evidence of vascular injury, and histopathologic sections from the common carotid arteries confirmed the lack of vascular damage.
CONCLUSIONS: Microcatheter tip microcoils for endovascular catheter steering in MRI experience minimal RF heating under the conditions tested. These data provide the basis for further in vivo testing of this promising technology for endovascular interventional MRI.
Copyright © 2011 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075019      PMCID: PMC3034801          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  17 in total

1.  Investigation of the factors responsible for burns during MRI.

Authors:  M F Dempsey; B Condon; D M Hadley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Heating around intravascular guidewires by resonating RF waves.

Authors:  M K Konings; L W Bartels; H F Smits; C J Bakker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  RF transmit power limit for the barewire loopless catheter antenna.

Authors:  C J Yeung; E Atalar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Safety of MRI-guided endovascular guidewire applications.

Authors:  C Y Liu; K Farahani; D S Lu; G Duckwiler; A Oppelt
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  RF safety of wires in interventional MRI: using a safety index.

Authors:  Christopher J Yeung; Robert C Susil; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  On the heating of linear conductive structures as guide wires and catheters in interventional MRI.

Authors:  W R Nitz; A Oppelt; W Renz; C Manke; M Lenhart; J Link
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Development of an intravascular heating source using an MR imaging guidewire.

Authors:  Bensheng Qiu; Christopher J Yeung; Xiangying Du; Ergin Atalar; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: implants and devices.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Magnetically-assisted remote control (MARC) steering of endovascular catheters for interventional MRI: a model for deflection and design implications.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Marshall S Sussman; Mark W Wilson; Steven Hetts; Ronald L Arenson; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Walter Kucharczyk; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Reduction of resonant RF heating in intravascular catheters using coaxial chokes.

Authors:  M E Ladd; H H Quick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparing deflection measurements of a magnetically steerable catheter using optical imaging and MRI.

Authors:  Prasheel Lillaney; Curtis Caton; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Leland Evans; Maythem Saeed; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Direct cooling of the catheter tip increases safety for CMR-guided electrophysiological procedures.

Authors:  Theresa Reiter; Daniel Gensler; Oliver Ritter; Ingo Weiss; Wolfgang Geistert; Ralf Kaufmann; Sabine Hoffmeister; Michael T Friedrich; Stefan Wintzheimer; Markus Düring; Peter Nordbeck; Peter M Jakob; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Digital subtraction MR angiography roadmapping for magnetic steerable catheter tracking.

Authors:  Alastair J Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Maythem Saeed; Aaron D Losey; Fabio Settecase; Lee Evans; Ronald L Arenson; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  State of the Art and Future Opportunities in MRI-Guided Robot-Assisted Surgery and Interventions.

Authors:  Hao Su; Ka-Wai Kwok; Kevin Cleary; Iulian Iordachita; M Cenk Cavusoglu; Jaydev P Desai; Gregory S Fischer
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 14.910

5.  Magnetic catheter manipulation in the interventional MR imaging environment.

Authors:  Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Magnetically assisted remote-controlled endovascular catheter for interventional MR imaging: in vitro navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Aaron D Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Bradford R H Thorne; Ryan S Sincic; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Endovascular catheter for magnetic navigation under MR imaging guidance: evaluation of safety in vivo at 1.5T.

Authors:  S W Hetts; M Saeed; A J Martin; L Evans; A F Bernhardt; V Malba; F Settecase; L Do; E J Yee; A Losey; R Sincic; P Lillaney; S Roy; R L Arenson; M W Wilson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  System architecture for a magnetically guided endovascular microcatheter.

Authors:  Ryan S Sincic; Curtis J Caton; Prasheel Lillaney; Scott Goodfriend; Jason Ni; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Neel Shah; Erin J Yee; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Fabio Settecase; Daniel L Cooke; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 9.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Passive Catheter Tracking for Endovascular Therapy.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Alastair J Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron Losey; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI.

Authors:  Leah Muller; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.