RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was too assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiofrequency (RF)-related heating of conductive wire coils used in magnetically steerable endovascular catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-axis microcoil was fabricated onto a 1.8Fr catheter tip. In vitro testing was performed on a 1.5-T MRI system using an agarose gel-filled vessel phantom, a transmit-receive body RF coil, a steady-state free precession pulse sequence, and a fluoroptic thermometry system. Temperature was measured without simulated blood flow at varying distances from the magnet isocenter and at varying flip angles. Additional experiments were performed with laser-lithographed single-axis microcoil-tipped microcatheters in air and in a saline bath with varied grounding of the microcoil wires. Preliminary in vivo evaluation of RF heating was performed in pigs at 1.5 T with coil-tipped catheters in various positions in the common carotid arteries with steady-state free precession pulse sequence on and off and under physiologic-flow and zero-flow conditions. RESULTS: In tissue-mimicking agarose gel, RF heating resulted in a maximal temperature increase of 0.35°C after 15 minutes of imaging, 15 cm from the magnet isocenter. For a single-axis microcoil, maximal temperature increases were 0.73°C to 1.91°C in air and 0.45°C to 0.55°C in saline. In vivo, delayed contrast-enhanced MRI revealed no evidence of vascular injury, and histopathologic sections from the common carotid arteries confirmed the lack of vascular damage. CONCLUSIONS: Microcatheter tip microcoils for endovascular catheter steering in MRI experience minimal RF heating under the conditions tested. These data provide the basis for further in vivo testing of this promising technology for endovascular interventional MRI.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was too assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiofrequency (RF)-related heating of conductive wire coils used in magnetically steerable endovascular catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-axis microcoil was fabricated onto a 1.8Fr catheter tip. In vitro testing was performed on a 1.5-T MRI system using an agarose gel-filled vessel phantom, a transmit-receive body RFcoil, a steady-state free precession pulse sequence, and a fluoroptic thermometry system. Temperature was measured without simulated blood flow at varying distances from the magnet isocenter and at varying flip angles. Additional experiments were performed with laser-lithographed single-axis microcoil-tipped microcatheters in air and in a saline bath with varied grounding of the microcoil wires. Preliminary in vivo evaluation of RF heating was performed in pigs at 1.5 T with coil-tipped catheters in various positions in the common carotid arteries with steady-state free precession pulse sequence on and off and under physiologic-flow and zero-flow conditions. RESULTS: In tissue-mimicking agarose gel, RF heating resulted in a maximal temperature increase of 0.35°C after 15 minutes of imaging, 15 cm from the magnet isocenter. For a single-axis microcoil, maximal temperature increases were 0.73°C to 1.91°C in air and 0.45°C to 0.55°C in saline. In vivo, delayed contrast-enhanced MRI revealed no evidence of vascular injury, and histopathologic sections from the common carotid arteries confirmed the lack of vascular damage. CONCLUSIONS: Microcatheter tip microcoils for endovascular catheter steering in MRI experience minimal RF heating under the conditions tested. These data provide the basis for further in vivo testing of this promising technology for endovascular interventional MRI.
Authors: Fabio Settecase; Marshall S Sussman; Mark W Wilson; Steven Hetts; Ronald L Arenson; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Walter Kucharczyk; Timothy P L Roberts Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Prasheel Lillaney; Curtis Caton; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Leland Evans; Maythem Saeed; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Theresa Reiter; Daniel Gensler; Oliver Ritter; Ingo Weiss; Wolfgang Geistert; Ralf Kaufmann; Sabine Hoffmeister; Michael T Friedrich; Stefan Wintzheimer; Markus Düring; Peter Nordbeck; Peter M Jakob; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Wolfgang R Bauer Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Alastair J Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Maythem Saeed; Aaron D Losey; Fabio Settecase; Lee Evans; Ronald L Arenson; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hao Su; Ka-Wai Kwok; Kevin Cleary; Iulian Iordachita; M Cenk Cavusoglu; Jaydev P Desai; Gregory S Fischer Journal: Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 14.910
Authors: Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Aaron D Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Bradford R H Thorne; Ryan S Sincic; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W Hetts Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S W Hetts; M Saeed; A J Martin; L Evans; A F Bernhardt; V Malba; F Settecase; L Do; E J Yee; A Losey; R Sincic; P Lillaney; S Roy; R L Arenson; M W Wilson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ryan S Sincic; Curtis J Caton; Prasheel Lillaney; Scott Goodfriend; Jason Ni; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Neel Shah; Erin J Yee; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Fabio Settecase; Daniel L Cooke; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.838