| Literature DB >> 26499277 |
Fabio Settecase1, Alastair J Martin2, Prasheel Lillaney3, Aaron Losey3, Steven W Hetts4.
Abstract
The use of MR guidance for endovascular intervention is appealing because of its lack of ionizing radiation, high-contrast visualization of vessel walls and adjacent soft tissues, multiplanar capabilities, and potential to incorporate functional information such as flow, fluid dynamics, perfusion, and cardiac motion. This review highlights state-of-the-art imaging techniques and hardware used for passive tracking of endovascular devices in interventional MR imaging, including negative contrast, passive contrast, nonproton multispectral, and direct current techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of passive tracking relative to active tracking are also summarized.Entities:
Keywords: Device tracking; Endovascular intervention; MR angiography; MR imaging; Passive tracking; Real-time MR imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26499277 PMCID: PMC4621770 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2015.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am ISSN: 1064-9689 Impact factor: 2.266