PURPOSE: To compare in vitro navigation of a magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter under real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with manual navigation under MR imaging and standard x-ray guidance in endovascular catheterization procedures in an abdominal aortic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2-mm-diameter custom clinical-grade microcatheter prototype with a solenoid coil at the distal tip was deflected with a foot pedal actuator used to deliver 300 mA of positive or negative current. Investigators navigated the catheter into branch vessels in a custom cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated under MR imaging guidance without magnetic assistance and under conventional x-ray fluoroscopy. MR experiments were performed at 1.5 T by using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence. The mean procedure times and percentage success data were determined and analyzed with a linear mixed-effects regression analysis. RESULTS: The catheter was clearly visible under real-time MR imaging. One hundred ninety-two (80%) of 240 turns were successfully completed with magnetically assisted guidance versus 144 (60%) of 240 turns with nonassisted guidance (P < .001) and 119 (74%) of 160 turns with standard x-ray guidance (P = .028). Overall mean procedure time was shorter with magnetically assisted than with nonassisted guidance under MR imaging (37 seconds ± 6 [standard error of the mean] vs 55 seconds ± 3, P < .001), and time was comparable between magnetically assisted and standard x-ray guidance (37 seconds ± 6 vs 44 seconds ± 3, P = .045). When stratified by angle of branch vessel, magnetic assistance was faster than nonassisted MR guidance at turns of 45°, 60°, and 75°. CONCLUSION: In this study, a MARC catheter for endovascular navigation under real-time MR imaging guidance was developed and tested. For catheterization of branch vessels arising at large angles, magnetically assisted catheterization was faster than manual catheterization under MR imaging guidance and was comparable to standard x-ray guidance.
PURPOSE: To compare in vitro navigation of a magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter under real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with manual navigation under MR imaging and standard x-ray guidance in endovascular catheterization procedures in an abdominal aortic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2-mm-diameter custom clinical-grade microcatheter prototype with a solenoid coil at the distal tip was deflected with a foot pedal actuator used to deliver 300 mA of positive or negative current. Investigators navigated the catheter into branch vessels in a custom cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated under MR imaging guidance without magnetic assistance and under conventional x-ray fluoroscopy. MR experiments were performed at 1.5 T by using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence. The mean procedure times and percentage success data were determined and analyzed with a linear mixed-effects regression analysis. RESULTS: The catheter was clearly visible under real-time MR imaging. One hundred ninety-two (80%) of 240 turns were successfully completed with magnetically assisted guidance versus 144 (60%) of 240 turns with nonassisted guidance (P < .001) and 119 (74%) of 160 turns with standard x-ray guidance (P = .028). Overall mean procedure time was shorter with magnetically assisted than with nonassisted guidance under MR imaging (37 seconds ± 6 [standard error of the mean] vs 55 seconds ± 3, P < .001), and time was comparable between magnetically assisted and standard x-ray guidance (37 seconds ± 6 vs 44 seconds ± 3, P = .045). When stratified by angle of branch vessel, magnetic assistance was faster than nonassisted MR guidance at turns of 45°, 60°, and 75°. CONCLUSION: In this study, a MARC catheter for endovascular navigation under real-time MR imaging guidance was developed and tested. For catheterization of branch vessels arising at large angles, magnetically assisted catheterization was faster than manual catheterization under MR imaging guidance and was comparable to standard x-ray guidance.
Authors: Steven W Hetts; Maythem Saeed; Alastair Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron Losey; Erin Jeannie Yee; Ryan Sincic; Loi Do; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Mark W Wilson; Anand Patel; Ronald L Arenson; Curtis Caton; Daniel L Cooke Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Jamie A Bell; Christina E Saikus; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Vincent Wu; Merdim Sonmez; Anthony Z Faranesh; Jessica H Colyer; Robert J Lederman; Ozgur Kocaturk Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: P V Karmarkar; D L Kraitchman; I Izbudak; L V Hofmann; L C Amado; D Fritzges; R Young; M Pittenger; J W M Bulte; E Atalar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S W Hetts; M Saeed; A J Martin; L Evans; A F Bernhardt; V Malba; F Settecase; L Do; E J Yee; A Losey; R Sincic; P Lillaney; S Roy; R L Arenson; M W Wilson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Maythem Saeed; Randall Lee; Alastair Martin; Oliver Weber; Gabriele A Krombach; Simon Schalla; Michael Lee; David Saloner; Charles B Higgins Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Daniel L Cooke; Alastair J Martin; Bradford R H Thorne; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Fabiola Fernández-Gutiérrez; Santiago Martínez; Martin A Rube; Benjamin F Cox; Mahsa Fatahi; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; J Graeme Houston; Helen McLeod; Richard D White; Karen French; Mariana Gueorguieva; Erwin Immel; Andreas Melzer Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Prasheel V Lillaney; Jeffrey K Yang; Aaron D Losey; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Bradford R H Thorne; David C Barry; Andrew Chu; Carol Stillson; Loi Do; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 11.105