Literature DB >> 24533872

Magnetically assisted remote-controlled endovascular catheter for interventional MR imaging: in vitro navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray fluoroscopy.

Aaron D Losey1, Prasheel Lillaney, Alastair J Martin, Daniel L Cooke, Mark W Wilson, Bradford R H Thorne, Ryan S Sincic, Ronald L Arenson, Maythem Saeed, Steven W Hetts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare in vitro navigation of a magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter under real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with manual navigation under MR imaging and standard x-ray guidance in endovascular catheterization procedures in an abdominal aortic phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2-mm-diameter custom clinical-grade microcatheter prototype with a solenoid coil at the distal tip was deflected with a foot pedal actuator used to deliver 300 mA of positive or negative current. Investigators navigated the catheter into branch vessels in a custom cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated under MR imaging guidance without magnetic assistance and under conventional x-ray fluoroscopy. MR experiments were performed at 1.5 T by using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence. The mean procedure times and percentage success data were determined and analyzed with a linear mixed-effects regression analysis.
RESULTS: The catheter was clearly visible under real-time MR imaging. One hundred ninety-two (80%) of 240 turns were successfully completed with magnetically assisted guidance versus 144 (60%) of 240 turns with nonassisted guidance (P < .001) and 119 (74%) of 160 turns with standard x-ray guidance (P = .028). Overall mean procedure time was shorter with magnetically assisted than with nonassisted guidance under MR imaging (37 seconds ± 6 [standard error of the mean] vs 55 seconds ± 3, P < .001), and time was comparable between magnetically assisted and standard x-ray guidance (37 seconds ± 6 vs 44 seconds ± 3, P = .045). When stratified by angle of branch vessel, magnetic assistance was faster than nonassisted MR guidance at turns of 45°, 60°, and 75°.
CONCLUSION: In this study, a MARC catheter for endovascular navigation under real-time MR imaging guidance was developed and tested. For catheterization of branch vessels arising at large angles, magnetically assisted catheterization was faster than manual catheterization under MR imaging guidance and was comparable to standard x-ray guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24533872      PMCID: PMC4065602          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Remote control of catheter tip deflection: an opportunity for interventional MRI.

Authors:  T P L Roberts; W V Hassenzahl; S W Hetts; R L Arenson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Control of intravascular catheters using an array of active steering coils.

Authors:  N Gudino; J A Heilman; J J Derakhshan; J L Sunshine; J L Duerk; M A Griswold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Steven W Hetts; Maythem Saeed; Alastair Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron Losey; Erin Jeannie Yee; Ryan Sincic; Loi Do; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Mark W Wilson; Anand Patel; Ronald L Arenson; Curtis Caton; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  A deflectable guiding catheter for real-time MRI-guided interventions.

Authors:  Jamie A Bell; Christina E Saikus; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Vincent Wu; Merdim Sonmez; Anthony Z Faranesh; Jessica H Colyer; Robert J Lederman; Ozgur Kocaturk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Characterization of the deflections of a catheter steered using a magnetic resonance imaging system.

Authors:  Frederick P Gosselin; Viviane Lalande; Sylvain Martel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Magnetic catheter manipulation in the interventional MR imaging environment.

Authors:  Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  MR-trackable intramyocardial injection catheter.

Authors:  P V Karmarkar; D L Kraitchman; I Izbudak; L V Hofmann; L C Amado; D Fritzges; R Young; M Pittenger; J W M Bulte; E Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Endovascular catheter for magnetic navigation under MR imaging guidance: evaluation of safety in vivo at 1.5T.

Authors:  S W Hetts; M Saeed; A J Martin; L Evans; A F Bernhardt; V Malba; F Settecase; L Do; E J Yee; A Losey; R Sincic; P Lillaney; S Roy; R L Arenson; M W Wilson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Transendocardial delivery of extracellular myocardial markers by using combination X-ray/MR fluoroscopic guidance: feasibility study in dogs.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Randall Lee; Alastair Martin; Oliver Weber; Gabriele A Krombach; Simon Schalla; Michael Lee; David Saloner; Charles B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI.

Authors:  Leah Muller; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  5 in total

1.  New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Daniel L Cooke; Alastair J Martin; Bradford R H Thorne; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions: an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study.

Authors:  Fabiola Fernández-Gutiérrez; Santiago Martínez; Martin A Rube; Benjamin F Cox; Mahsa Fatahi; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; J Graeme Houston; Helen McLeod; Richard D White; Karen French; Mariana Gueorguieva; Erwin Immel; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Design of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Magnetically Actuated Steerable Catheter.

Authors:  Taoming Liu; Nate Lombard Poirot; Tipakorn Greigarn; M Cenk Çavuşoğlu
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 0.582

4.  Endovascular MR-guided Renal Embolization by Using a Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Catheter System.

Authors:  Prasheel V Lillaney; Jeffrey K Yang; Aaron D Losey; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Bradford R H Thorne; David C Barry; Andrew Chu; Carol Stillson; Loi Do; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Development of a smart guide wire using an electrostrictive polymer: option for steerable orientation and force feedback.

Authors:  F Ganet; M Q Le; J F Capsal; P Lermusiaux; L Petit; A Millon; P J Cottinet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.