Literature DB >> 17879774

Magnetically-assisted remote control (MARC) steering of endovascular catheters for interventional MRI: a model for deflection and design implications.

Fabio Settecase1, Marshall S Sussman, Mark W Wilson, Steven Hetts, Ronald L Arenson, Vincent Malba, Anthony F Bernhardt, Walter Kucharczyk, Timothy P L Roberts.   

Abstract

Current applied to wire coils wound at the tip of an endovascular catheter can be used to remotely steer a catheter under magnetic resonance imaging guidance. In this study, we derive and validate an equation that characterizes the relationship between deflection and a number of physical factors: theta/sin(gamma-theta) = nIABL/EI(A) where theta is the deflection angle, n is the number of solenoidal turns, I is the current, A is the cross-sectional area of the catheter tip, B is the magnetic resonance (MR) scanner main magnetic field, L is the unconstrained catheter length, E is Young's Modulus for the catheter material, and I(A) is the area moment of inertia, and y is the initial angle between the catheter tip and B. Solenoids of 50, 100, or 150 turns were wound on 1.8 F and 5 F catheters. Varying currents were applied remotely using a DC power supply in the MRI control room. The distal catheter tip was suspended within a phantom at varying lengths. Images were obtained with a 1.5 T or a 3 T MR scanner using "real-time" MR pulse sequences. Deflection angles were measured on acquired images. Catheter bending stiffess was determined using a tensile testing apparatus and a stereomicroscope. Predicted relationships between deflection and various physical factors were observed (R2 = 0.98-0.99). The derived equation provides a framework for modeling of the behavior of the specialized catheter tip. Each physical factor studied has implications for catheter design and device implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879774      PMCID: PMC3980585          DOI: 10.1118/1.2750963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  32 in total

1.  Incidence, management, and outcome of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  L Gruberg; E Pinnow; R Flood; Y Bonnet; M Tebeica; R Waksman; L F Satler; A D Pichard; K M Kent; M B Leon; J Lindsay
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous intervention: incidence and outcome.

Authors:  M G Gunning; I L Williams; D E Jewitt; A M Shah; R J Wainwright; M R Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  New magnetic resonance contrast agents as biochemical reporters.

Authors:  Thomas J Meade; Alisha K Taylor; Steven R Bull
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Endovascular interventional MRI.

Authors:  Christine B Henk; Charles B Higgins; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  pH-dependent modulation of relaxivity and luminescence in macrocyclic gadolinium and europium complexes based on reversible intramolecular sulfonamide ligation.

Authors:  M P Lowe; D Parker; O Reany; S Aime; M Botta; G Castellano; E Gianolio; R Pagliarin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Early and late clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fukutomi; Takahiko Suzuki; Jeffrey J Popma; Hiroaki Hosokawa; Kouichi Yokoya; Tsuyoshi Inada; Motoya Hayase; Hiroaki Kondo; Shigenori Ito; Shogo Suzuki; Makoto Itoh
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Abdominal myomectomy versus uterine fibroid embolization in the treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.

Authors:  Mahmood K Razavi; Gloria Hwang; Ayda Jahed; Shohreh Modanlou; Shohreh Modanloo; Bertha Chen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases and intracranial neoplasms.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  28 in total

1.  RF Heating of MRI-Assisted Catheter Steering Coils for Interventional MRI.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Steven W Hetts; Alastair J Martin; Timothy P L Roberts; Anthony F Bernhardt; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Walter Kucharzyk; Mark W Wilson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Steerable catheter microcoils for interventional MRI reducing resistive heating.

Authors:  Anthony Bernhardt; Mark W Wilson; Fabio Settecase; Leland Evans; Vincent Malba; Alastair J Martin; Maythem Saeed; Timothy P L Roberts; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  The performance of interventional loopless MRI antennae at higher magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  AbdEl-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Di Qian; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Control of intravascular catheters using an array of active steering coils.

Authors:  N Gudino; J A Heilman; J J Derakhshan; J L Sunshine; J L Duerk; M A Griswold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Daniel L Cooke; Alastair J Martin; Bradford R H Thorne; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Design of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Magnetically Actuated Steerable Catheter.

Authors:  Taoming Liu; Nate Lombard Poirot; Tipakorn Greigarn; M Cenk Çavuşoğlu
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 0.582

7.  Comparing deflection measurements of a magnetically steerable catheter using optical imaging and MRI.

Authors:  Prasheel Lillaney; Curtis Caton; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Leland Evans; Maythem Saeed; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGIs).

Authors:  Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Modeling and Validation of the Three-Dimensional Deflection of an MRI-Compatible Magnetically Actuated Steerable Catheter.

Authors:  Taoming Liu; Nate Lombard Poirot; Dominique Franson; Nicole Seiberlich; Mark A Griswold; M Cenk Cavusoglu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance guided electrophysiology studies.

Authors:  Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Albert C Lardo; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.