Literature DB >> 20968366

Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Josh H McDermott1, Michael V Keebler, Christophe Micheyl, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Pitch intervals are central to most musical systems, which utilize pitch at the expense of other acoustic dimensions. It seemed plausible that pitch might uniquely permit precise perception of the interval separating two sounds, as this could help explain its importance in music. To explore this notion, a simple discrimination task was used to measure the precision of interval perception for the auditory dimensions of pitch, brightness, and loudness. Interval thresholds were then expressed in units of just-noticeable differences for each dimension, to enable comparison across dimensions. Contrary to expectation, when expressed in these common units, interval acuity was actually worse for pitch than for loudness or brightness. This likely indicates that the perceptual dimension of pitch is unusual not for interval perception per se, but rather for the basic frequency resolution it supports. The ubiquity of pitch in music may be due in part to this fine-grained basic resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968366      PMCID: PMC2981111          DOI: 10.1121/1.3478785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Global and local processing of musical sequences: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  A Schiavetto; F Cortese; C Alain
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Automatic and controlled processing of melodic contour and interval information measured by electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Laurel J Trainor; Kelly L McDonald; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The evolution of music.

Authors:  Josh McDermott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Daniel Pressnitzer; Catherine Semal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; C C Wier; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency and frequency-ratio resolution by possessors of absolute and relative pitch: examples of categorical perception.

Authors:  E M Burns; S L Campbell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Categorical perception--phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals.

Authors:  E M Burns; W D Ward
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12
View more
  26 in total

1.  Expectations for melodic contours transcend pitch.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: Prehistoric.

Authors:  Aleksey Nikolsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16

3.  Pitch-interval discrimination and musical expertise: is the semitone a perceptual boundary?

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Caroline R Ritson; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Megan E Masterson; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relative contribution of pitch and brightness to the auditory kappa effect.

Authors:  Nicolas Marty; Maxime Marty; Micha Pfeuty
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-22

6.  Toward a quantitative account of pitch distribution in spontaneous narrative: method and validation.

Authors:  Samuel E Matteson; Gloria Streit Olness; Nancy J Caplow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Standard-interval size affects interval-discrimination thresholds for pure-tone melodic pitch intervals.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Agathe Pralus; Lesly Fornoni; Andrew J Oxenham; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.