Literature DB >> 25324084

Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Xin Luo1, Megan E Masterson1, Ching-Chih Wu1.   

Abstract

The perception of melodic intervals (sequential pitch differences) is essential to music perception. This study tested melodic interval perception in normal-hearing (NH) listeners and cochlear implant (CI) users. Melodic interval ranking was tested using an adaptive procedure. CI users had slightly higher interval ranking thresholds than NH listeners. Both groups' interval ranking thresholds, although not affected by root note, significantly increased with standard interval size and were higher for descending intervals than for ascending intervals. The pitch direction effect may be due to a procedural artifact or a difference in central processing. In another test, familiar melodies were played with all the intervals scaled by a single factor. Subjects rated how in tune the melodies were and adjusted the scaling factor until the melodies sounded the most in tune. CI users had lower final interval ratings and less change in interval rating as a function of scaling factor than NH listeners. For CI users, the root-mean-square error of the final scaling factors and the width of the interval rating function were significantly correlated with the average ranking threshold for ascending rather than descending intervals, suggesting that CI users may have focused on ascending intervals when rating and adjusting the melodies.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25324084      PMCID: PMC4241717          DOI: 10.1121/1.4894738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution.

Authors:  Krista L Hyde; Isabelle Peretz; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Identification, discrimination, and selective adaptation of simultaneous musical intervals.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; A R Halpern
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-11

5.  Frequency and frequency-ratio resolution by possessors of absolute and relative pitch: examples of categorical perception.

Authors:  E M Burns; S L Campbell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Categorical perception--phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals.

Authors:  E M Burns; W D Ward
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  S Pijl
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Varieties of musical disorders. The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Annie Sophie Champod; Krista Hyde
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  10 in total

1.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

2.  Standard-interval size affects interval-discrimination thresholds for pure-tone melodic pitch intervals.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  High Oxygen Exchange to Music Indicates Auditory Distractibility in Acquired Brain Injury: An fNIRS Study with a Vector-Based Phase Analysis.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu; Joon-Ho Shin; Gyu Hyun Kwon; Geonsang Jo; Ji-Yeong Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vibrotactile Stimulation Based on the Fundamental Frequency Can Improve Melodic Contour Identification of Normal-Hearing Listeners With a 4-Channel Cochlear Implant Simulation.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Lauren Hayes
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Pure tone discrimination with cochlear implants and filter-band spread.

Authors:  Luise Wagner; Reyhan Altindal; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Computer-based musical interval training program for Cochlear implant users and listeners with no known hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Rebekah Subrahmanyam Bissmeyer; Jacqueline Rose Ortiz; Helena Gan; Raymond Lee Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Melodic Contour Identification Reflects the Cognitive Threshold of Aging.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Mismatch negativity reflects asymmetric pre-attentive harmonic interval discrimination.

Authors:  Luise Wagner; Torsten Rahne; Stefan K Plontke; Nico Heidekrüger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.