Literature DB >> 19739748

Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors.

Laurent Demany1, Daniel Pressnitzer, Catherine Semal.   

Abstract

Demany and Ramos [(2005). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 833-841] found that it is possible to hear an upward or downward pitch change between two successive pure tones differing in frequency even when the first tone is informationally masked by other tones, preventing a conscious perception of its pitch. This provides evidence for the existence of automatic frequency-shift detectors (FSDs) in the auditory system. The present study was intended to estimate the magnitude of the frequency shifts optimally detected by the FSDs. Listeners were presented with sound sequences consisting of (1) a 300-ms or 100-ms random "chord" of synchronous pure tones, separated by constant intervals of either 650 cents or 1000 cents; (2) an interstimulus interval (ISI) varying from 100 to 900 ms; (3) a single pure tone at a variable frequency distance (Delta) from a randomly selected component of the chord. The task was to indicate if the final pure tone was higher or lower than the nearest component of the chord. Irrespective of the chord's properties and of the ISI, performance was best when Delta was equal to about 120 cents (1/10 octave). Therefore, this interval seems to be the frequency shift optimally detected by the FSDs.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19739748     DOI: 10.1121/1.3179675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Fundamental differences in change detection between vision and audition.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal; Jean-René Cazalets; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Christophe Micheyl; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral motion contrast as a speech context effect.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory stream segregation for alternating and synchronous tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Coral Hanson; Laurent Demany; Shihab Shamma; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Effect of Context on the Contribution of Individual Harmonics to Residue Pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Sami Alsindi; Charles Hardy; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-28

7.  The 1.06 frequency ratio in the cochlea: evidence and outlook for a natural musical semitone.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  A neuronal network model for context-dependence of pitch change perception.

Authors:  Chengcheng Huang; Bernhard Englitz; Shihab Shamma; John Rinzel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Samuele Carcagno; Laurent Demany; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-17

10.  Aftereffects of Spectrally Similar and Dissimilar Spectral Motion Adaptors in the Tritone Paradox.

Authors:  Stephanie Malek; Konrad Sperschneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.