Literature DB >> 31035223

Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Fawen Zhang1, Gabrielle Underwood2, Kelli McGuire2, Chun Liang3, David R Moore4, Qian-Jie Fu5.   

Abstract

Dynamic frequency changes in sound provide critical cues for speech perception. Most previous studies examining frequency discrimination in cochlear implant (CI) users have employed behavioral tasks in which target and reference tones (differing in frequency) are presented statically in separate time intervals. Participants are required to identify the target frequency by comparing stimuli across these time intervals. However, perceiving dynamic frequency changes in speech requires detection of within-interval frequency change. This study explored the relationship between detection of within-interval frequency changes and speech perception performance of CI users. Frequency change detection thresholds (FCDTs) were measured in 20 adult CI users using a 3-alternative forced-choice (3AFC) procedure. Stimuli were 1-sec pure tones (base frequencies at 0.25, 1, 4 kHz) with frequency changes occurring 0.5 s after the tone onset. Speech tests were 1) Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) monosyllabic word recognition, 2) Arizona Biomedical Sentence Recognition (AzBio) in Quiet, 3) AzBio in Noise (AzBio-N, +10 dB signal-to-noise/SNR ratio), and 4) Digits-in-noise (DIN). Participants' subjective satisfaction with the CI was obtained. Results showed that correlations between FCDTs and speech perception were all statistically significant. The satisfaction level of CI use was not related to FCDTs, after controlling for major demographic factors. DIN speech reception thresholds were significantly correlated to AzBio-N scores. The current findings suggest that the ability to detect within-interval frequency changes may play an important role in speech perception performance of CI users. FCDT and DIN can serve as simple and rapid tests that require no or minimal linguistic background for the prediction of CI speech outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 University of Cincinnati. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Frequency change detection; Speech perception

Year:  2019        PMID: 31035223      PMCID: PMC6571168          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  64 in total

1.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; Aniket A Saoji; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.

Authors:  Andrew Vandali; David Sly; Robert Cowan; Richard van Hoesel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency, measured in several ways.

Authors:  A Sek; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Min-Yu Cheng; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Effects of Long-Term Musical Training on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Carolyn J Brown; Eun-Kyung Jeon; Virginia Driscoll; Bruna Mussoi; Shruti Balvalli Deshpande; Kate Gfeller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Comparing the performance plateau in adult cochlear implant patients using HINT and AzBio.

Authors:  Sean T Massa; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Alden O Timme; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Qing Tang; Thomas Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relationship Between the Ability to Detect Frequency Changes or Temporal Gaps and Speech Perception Performance in Post-lingual Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Dianzhao Xie; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Jinming Li; Xianqi Liu; Zhaomin Fan; Haibo Wang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Speech intelligibility and auditory perception of pre-school children with Hearing Aid, cochlear implant and Typical Hearing.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashori
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-11-15

3.  Musical Sound Quality as a Function of the Number of Channels in Modern Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Katelyn Berg; Jack Noble; Benoit Dawant; Robert Dwyer; Robert Labadie; Virginia Richards; René Gifford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Sara Magits; Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chun Liang; Lisa H Wenstrup; Ravi N Samy; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Attentive Music Listening on Cochlear Implant Users' Speech Perception, Quality of Life, and Behavioral and Objective Measures of Frequency Change Detection.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Firestone; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; Nanhua Zhang; Chelsea M Blankenship; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.