Literature DB >> 19121136

Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Josh H McDermott1, Andriana J Lehr, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Melodies, speech, and other stimuli that vary in pitch are processed largely in terms of the relative pitch differences between sounds. Relative representations permit recognition of pitch patterns despite variations in overall pitch level between instruments or speakers. A key component of relative pitch is the sequence of pitch increases and decreases from note to note, known as the melodic contour. Here we report that contour representations are also produced by patterns in loudness and brightness (an aspect of timbre). The representations of contours in different dimensions evidently have much in common, as contours in one dimension can be readily recognized in other dimensions. Moreover, contours in loudness and brightness are nearly as useful as pitch contours for recognizing familiar melodies that are normally conveyed via pitch. Our results indicate that relative representations via contour extraction are a general feature of the auditory system, and may have a common central locus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19121136      PMCID: PMC2841133          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02235.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  20 in total

1.  Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

2.  Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness.

Authors:  R D Melara; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

3.  The psychophysics of categorical perception.

Authors:  N A Macmillan; H L Kaplan; C D Creelman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Resonance-frequency discrimination.

Authors:  J P Gagné; P M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tune recognition with reduced pitch and interval information.

Authors:  B C Moore; S M Rosen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.

Authors:  W J Dowling; D S Fujitani
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  F Attneave; R K Olson
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1971-06

Review 9.  Modularity of music processing.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Max Coltheart
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Infants' perception of melodies: the role of melodic contour.

Authors:  S E Trehub; D Bull; L A Thorpe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-06
View more
  35 in total

1.  Expectations for melodic contours transcend pitch.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evolution of tonal organization in music mirrors symbolic representation of perceptual reality. Part-1: Prehistoric.

Authors:  Aleksey Nikolsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-16

4.  Cortical pitch regions in humans respond primarily to resolved harmonics and are located in specific tonotopic regions of anterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam Norman-Haignere; Nancy Kanwisher; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Tonal hierarchy representations in auditory imagery.

Authors:  Dominique T Vuvan; Mark A Schmuckler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

6.  Relative contribution of pitch and brightness to the auditory kappa effect.

Authors:  Nicolas Marty; Maxime Marty; Micha Pfeuty
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-22

7.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

8.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

9.  Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Agathe Pralus; Lesly Fornoni; Andrew J Oxenham; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.