Literature DB >> 23654400

Toward a quantitative account of pitch distribution in spontaneous narrative: method and validation.

Samuel E Matteson1, Gloria Streit Olness, Nancy J Caplow.   

Abstract

Pitch is well-known both to animate human discourse and to convey meaning in communication. The study of the statistical population distributions of pitch in discourse will undoubtedly benefit from methodological improvements. The current investigation examines a method that parameterizes pitch in discourse as musical pitch interval H measured in units of cents and that disaggregates the sequence of peak word-pitches using tools employed in time-series analysis and digital signal processing. The investigators test the proposed methodology by its application to distributions in pitch interval of the peak word-pitch (collectively called the discourse gamut) that occur in simulated and actual spontaneous emotive narratives obtained from 17 middle-aged African-American adults. The analysis, in rigorous tests, not only faithfully reproduced simulated distributions imbedded in realistic time series that drift and include pitch breaks, but the protocol also reveals that the empirical distributions exhibit a common hidden structure when normalized to a slowly varying mode (called the gamut root) of their respective probability density functions. Quantitative differences between narratives reveal the speakers' relative propensity for the use of pitch levels corresponding to elevated degrees of a discourse gamut (the "e-la") superimposed upon a continuum that conforms systematically to an asymmetric Laplace distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23654400      PMCID: PMC3663868          DOI: 10.1121/1.4796111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain.

Authors:  J D Warren; S Uppenkamp; R D Patterson; T D Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The statistical structure of human speech sounds predicts musical universals.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Imprecise singing is widespread.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher; Steven Brown; Kimberly M Meier; Michel Belyk; Mario Liotti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Nonlinear modelling of double and triple period pitch breaks in vocal fold vibration.

Authors:  Fritz Menzer; Jonas Buchli; David M Howard; Auke Jan Ijspeert
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.487

6.  Absolute memory for musical pitch: evidence from the production of learned melodies.

Authors:  D J Levitin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-10

7.  Declination has not been defeated.

Authors:  J Hart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intonation and speaker identification.

Authors:  E Abberton; A J Fourcin
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1978 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Normal vibration frequencies of the vocal ligament.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The neurocognitive components of pitch processing: insights from absolute pitch.

Authors:  Sarah J Wilson; Dean Lusher; Catherine Y Wan; Paul Dudgeon; David C Reutens
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  1 in total

1.  Robust Rate-Place Coding of Resolved Components in Harmonic and Inharmonic Complex Tones in Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.