Literature DB >> 20815457

Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Xin Luo1, David M Landsberger, Monica Padilla, Arthi G Srinivasan.   

Abstract

This study investigated cochlear implant (CI) users' ability to perceive pitch cues from time-varying virtual channels (VCs) to identify pitch contours. Seven CI users were tested on apical, medial, and basal electrode pairs with stimulus durations from 100 to 1000 ms. In one stimulus set, 9 pitch contours were created by steering current between the component electrodes and the VC halfway between the electrodes. Another stimulus set only contained 3 pitch contours (flat, falling, and rising). VC discrimination was also tested on the same electrodes. The total current level of dual-electrode stimuli was linearly interpolated between those of single-electrode stimuli to minimize loudness changes. The results showed that pitch contour identification (PCI) scores were similar across electrode locations, and significantly improved at longer durations. For durations longer than 300 ms, 2 subjects had nearly perfect 9-contour identification, and 5 subjects perfectly identified the 3 basic contours. Both PCI and VC discrimination varied greatly across subjects. Cumulative d(') values for VC discrimination were significantly correlated with 100-, 200-, and 500-ms PCI scores. These results verify the feasibility of encoding pitch contours using current steering, and suggest that identification of such pitch contours strongly relies on CI users' sensitivity to VCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20815457      PMCID: PMC2945749          DOI: 10.1121/1.3474237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency discrimination with sequential or simultaneous stimulation in MED-EL cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrea Nobbe; Peter Schleich; Clemens Zierhofer; Peter Nopp
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  B Townshend; N Cotter; D Van Compernolle; R L White
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating.

Authors:  J F Culling; C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  H J McDermott; C M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

10.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Audio-vocal responses elicited in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Torrey M Loucks; Deepa Suneel; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.

Authors:  David Landsberger; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Julia Stelmach; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Contralateral masking in bilateral cochlear implant patients: a model of medial olivocochlear function loss.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Monica Padilla; Qian-Jie Fu; David M Landsberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.