Literature DB >> 8176059

Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating.

J F Culling1, C J Darwin.   

Abstract

Identification of simultaneous speech sounds, such as pairs of steady-state vowels (double vowels), is more accurate when there is a difference in fundamental frequency (F0). Accuracy of identification for double vowels increases with increasing F0 difference (delta F0) asymptoting above 1 semitone. The experiment described here attempts to distinguish two mechanisms underlying this effect: first, perceptual separation by grouping together harmonic components of a common F0; and, second, exploitation of the fluctuations in the spectral envelope of the composite stimulus that result from beating between unresolved components. The beating is mainly caused by interactions between corresponding harmonics of the two vowels with a small delta F0. Identification accuracy for normal, harmonically excited double vowels was compared with that for double vowels composed from the same components, but whose constituent vowels were excited by a mixture of the two harmonic series. These double vowels were designed to produce similar beating patterns to the normal double vowels. Both harmonically and inharmonically excited constituents improved identification with increasing delta F0, but the increase was larger for harmonically excited vowels. A computational model based upon psychophysical measurements of auditory frequency and temporal resolution correctly predicted an increase in accuracy of identification with increasing delta F0 which was attributable to beating. The results are interpreted in terms of a spectral change cue in the identification of double vowels with delta F0's which complements grouping by F0, and which plays a dominant role for delta F0's smaller than 1 semitone.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8176059     DOI: 10.1121/1.408543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 6.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

7.  Functional subdivisions in low-frequency primary auditory cortex (AI).

Authors:  M N Wallace; A R Palmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.