Literature DB >> 21895094

Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.

David Landsberger1, John J Galvin.   

Abstract

In cochlear implants (CIs), simultaneous or sequential stimulation of adjacent electrodes can produce intermediate pitch percepts between those of the component electrodes. However, it is unclear whether simultaneous and sequential virtual channels (VCs) can be discriminated. In this study, CI users were asked to discriminate simultaneous and sequential VCs; discrimination was measured for monopolar (MP) and bipolar + 1 stimulation (BP + 1), i.e., relatively broad and focused stimulation modes. For sequential VCs, the interpulse interval (IPI) varied between 0.0 and 1.8 ms. All stimuli were presented at comfortably loud, loudness-balanced levels at a 250 pulse per second per electrode (ppse) stimulation rate. On average, CI subjects were able to reliably discriminate between sequential and simultaneous VCs. While there was no significant effect of IPI or stimulation mode on VC discrimination, some subjects exhibited better VC discrimination with BP + 1 stimulation. Subjects' discrimination between sequential and simultaneous VCs was correlated with electrode discrimination, suggesting that spatial selectivity may influence perception of sequential VCs. To maintain equal loudness, sequential VC amplitudes were nearly double those of simultaneous VCs, presumably resulting in a broader spread of excitation. These results suggest that perceptual differences between simultaneous and sequential VCs might be explained by differences in the spread of excitation.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895094      PMCID: PMC3188970          DOI: 10.1121/1.3613938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Detection of small across-channel timing differences by cochlear implantees.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; L Geurts; J Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

3.  Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-27

4.  Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.

Authors:  Peter A Busby; Rolf D Battmer; Joerg Pesch
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Proposal of a new auditory nerve stimulation method for cochlear prosthesis.

Authors:  S Miyoshi; Y Iida; S Shimizu; J Matsushima; T Ifukube
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.094

6.  Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Architecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor.

Authors:  P Seligman; H McDermott
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

9.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  H J McDermott; C M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hugh J McDermott; Brett A Swanson; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-06

2.  Loudness summation using focused and unfocused electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.