Literature DB >> 36182279

Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Justin T Fleming1, Matthew B Winn1.   

Abstract

Perception of word stress is an important aspect of recognizing speech, guiding the listener toward candidate words based on the perceived stress pattern. Cochlear implant (CI) signal processing is likely to disrupt some of the available cues for word stress, particularly vowel quality and pitch contour changes. In this study, we used a cue weighting paradigm to investigate differences in stress cue weighting patterns between participants listening with CIs and those with normal hearing (NH). We found that participants with CIs gave less weight to frequency-based pitch and vowel quality cues than NH listeners but compensated by upweighting vowel duration and intensity cues. Nonetheless, CI listeners' stress judgments were also significantly influenced by vowel quality and pitch, and they modulated their usage of these cues depending on the specific word pair in a manner similar to NH participants. In a series of separate online experiments with NH listeners, we simulated aspects of bimodal hearing by combining low-pass filtered speech with a vocoded signal. In these conditions, participants upweighted pitch and vowel quality cues relative to a fully vocoded control condition, suggesting that bimodal listening holds promise for restoring the stress cue weighting patterns exhibited by listeners with NH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36182279      PMCID: PMC9439712          DOI: 10.1121/10.0013890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  88 in total

1.  Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Jessica Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition.

Authors:  L M Slowiaczek
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.

Authors:  Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Patti M Johnstone; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 9.  The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review.

Authors:  Erika A Woodson; Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Kate Gfeller; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.