Literature DB >> 20724356

Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Julie Arenberg Bierer1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants are highly successful neural prostheses for persons with severe or profound hearing loss who gain little benefit from hearing aid amplification. Although implants are capable of providing important spectral and temporal cues for speech perception, performance on speech tests is variable across listeners. Psychophysical measures obtained from individual implant subjects can also be highly variable across implant channels. This review discusses evidence that such variability reflects deviations in the electrode-neuron interface, which refers to an implant channel's ability to effectively stimulate the auditory nerve. It is proposed that focused electrical stimulation is ideally suited to assess channel-to-channel irregularities in the electrode-neuron interface. In implant listeners, it is demonstrated that channels with relatively high thresholds, as measured with the tripolar configuration, exhibit broader psychophysical tuning curves and smaller dynamic ranges than channels with relatively low thresholds. Broader tuning implies that frequency-specific information intended for one population of neurons in the cochlea may activate more distant neurons, and a compressed dynamic range could make it more difficult to resolve intensity-based information, particularly in the presence of competing noise. Degradation of both types of cues would negatively affect speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20724356      PMCID: PMC4111350          DOI: 10.1177/1084713810375249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  82 in total

1.  Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; S Hatsushika; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Multivariate predictors of success with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B J Gantz; G G Woodworth; J F Knutson; P J Abbas; R S Tyler
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993

9.  Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness.

Authors:  R Hinojosa; M Marion
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis.

Authors:  P A Busby; L A Whitford; P J Blamey; L M Richardson; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  52 in total

1.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Combining cell-based therapies and neural prostheses to promote neural survival.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon; Alison J Neil; Lisa N Pettingill; Marilyn S Geaney; Stephen J Skinner; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

5.  Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

7.  Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-19

8.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

10.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.