Literature DB >> 2212298

Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants.

R V Shannon1.   

Abstract

Forward masking was measured in 12 patients with cochlear implants. The amount of masking (in microamps) decreased linearly as a function of the logarithm of the signal delay from masker offset. Normalized forward-masking recovery functions for cochlear implants were similar to normalized functions of normal-hearing listeners, indicating that the mechanism of psychophysical forward masking is retrocochlear. These results indicate that the logarithm of acoustic amplitude should be mapped to microamps to produce normal forward masking in implanted patients. Despite the fact that the forward-masking recovery functions were similar across all patients, their performance with their speech processor varied widely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2212298     DOI: 10.1121/1.399777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

Review 1.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Lina A J Reiss; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 8.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

9.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17

10.  Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants: predicting performance from basic psychophysical measures.

Authors:  Stefan Kerber; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.