Literature DB >> 29869047

Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Lindsay DeVries1, Julie G Arenberg2.   

Abstract

Speech understanding abilities vary widely among cochlear implant (CI) listeners. A potential source of this variability is the electrode-neuron interface (ENI), which includes peripheral factors such as electrode position and integrity of remaining spiral ganglion neurons. Suboptimal positioning of the electrode array has been associated with poorer speech outcomes; however, postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans are often not available to clinicians. CT-estimated electrode-to-modiolus distance (distance from the inner wall of the cochlea) has been shown to account for some variability in behavioral thresholds. However, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) may provide additional insight into site-specific variation in channel interaction. Thirteen unilaterally implanted adults with the Advanced Bionics HiRes90K device participated. Behavioral thresholds and PTCs were collected for all available electrodes with steered quadrupolar (sQP) configuration, using a modified threshold sweep procedure, used in Bierer et al. (Trends Hear 19:1-12, 2015). PTC bandwidths were quantified to characterize channel interaction across the electrode array, and tip shifts were assessed to identify possible contributions of neural dead regions. Broader PTC bandwidths were correlated with electrodes farther from the modiolus, but not correlated with sQP threshold, though a trend was observed. Both measures were affected by scalar location, and PTC tip shifts were observed for electrodes farther from the modiolus. sQP threshold was the only variable correlated with word recognition. These results suggest PTCs may be used as a site-specific measure of channel interaction that correlates with electrode position in some CI listeners.

Keywords:  cochlear implants; electrode position; imaging; psychophysical tuning curves; psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29869047      PMCID: PMC6226415          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0678-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  54 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the deafened brain: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation.

Authors:  D S Lazard; A-L Giraud; D Gnansia; B Meyer; O Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

5.  The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.

Authors:  Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J H Frijns; S L de Snoo; R Schoonhoven
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Profound deafness. Associated sensory and neural degeneration.

Authors:  R Hinojosa; J R Lindsay
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1980-04

9.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

10.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  11 in total

1.  Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Meisam K Arjmandi; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

Review 2.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing Rapid and Traditional Forward-Masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Lindsay A DeVries; Julie G Arenberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Evaluating Psychophysical Polarity Sensitivity as an Indirect Estimate of Neural Status in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-04

6.  Word Recognition and Frequency Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Simulation: Effect of Channel Interaction.

Authors:  Pierre-Antoine Cucis; Christian Berger-Vachon; Hung Thaï-Van; Ruben Hermann; Stéphane Gallego; Eric Truy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Craig A Buchman; Emily Buss; Brendan P O'Connell; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Christopher K Giardina; Emily Buss; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Current Focusing to Reduce Channel Interaction for Distant Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Programs.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Polarity Sensitivity in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.