Literature DB >> 28253672

Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.

Elad Sagi1, Mario A Svirsky1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) recipients have difficulty understanding speech in noise even at moderate signal-to-noise ratios. Knowing the mechanisms they use to understand speech in noise may facilitate the search for better speech processing algorithms. In the present study, a computational model is used to assess whether CI users' vowel identification in noise can be explained by formant frequency cues (F1 and F2). Vowel identification was tested with 12 unilateral CI users in quiet and in noise. Formant cues were measured from vowels in each condition, specific to each subject's speech processor. Noise distorted the location of vowels in the F2 vs F1 plane in comparison to quiet. The best fit model to subjects' data in quiet produced model predictions in noise that were within 8% of actual scores on average. Predictions in noise were much better when assuming that subjects used a priori knowledge regarding how formant information is degraded in noise (experiment 1). However, the model's best fit to subjects' confusion matrices in noise was worse than in quiet, suggesting that CI users utilize formant cues to identify vowels in noise, but to a different extent than how they identify vowels in quiet (experiment 2).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28253672      PMCID: PMC5392095          DOI: 10.1121/1.4976059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

Review 1.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues.

Authors:  Gaurang Parikh; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Charlotte A Smith; Bronwen G Evans
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.

Authors:  Rikus Swanepoel; Dirk J J Oosthuizen; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations.

Authors:  Gunnar Geißler; Iris Arweiler; Phillipp Hehrmann; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-07-03

6.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

7.  Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise.

Authors:  R L Winslow; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels.

Authors:  S A Zahorian; A J Jagharghi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus 6 cochlear implant system: performance improvements with SmartSound iQ.

Authors:  Stefan J Mauger; Chris D Warren; Michelle R Knight; Michael Goorevich; Esti Nel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  1 in total

1.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.