Literature DB >> 6575668

Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness.

R Hinojosa, M Marion.   

Abstract

In all the cases of profound deafness that we examined, the sensory epithelium along the basilar membrane had severely degenerated. However, ganglion cell counts and peripheral fiber estimates demonstrated a high degree of variability when analyzed with respect to the state of the organ of Corti or the etiology of the original cochlear disorder. We conclude that a complex interplay of factors determines the number of cells remaining in the spiral ganglion at a given time. It appears impossible at present to predict which diseases or toxic states produce primarily a sensory loss while leaving a uniform and adequate number of cochlear neurons functionally intact. We would like to emphasize that although the ganglion cell counts were consistently reduced in all our cases of profound sensorineural deafness, it has always been a surprise to us to find that the actual numbers of surviving cells are considerable. Of 15 patients, all of whom were totally deaf, only 3 had ganglion cell counts less than 10,000, whereas the majority had counts well above 15,000. Observations of this kind are possible only if accurate ganglion cell counts are carried out. Estimating the number of spiral ganglion cells by only looking at microscopic sections usually results in estimates of greater cell loss than is actually present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6575668     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31662.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  33 in total

1.  Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.

Authors:  J D Harnsberger; M A Svirsky; A R Kaiser; D B Pisoni; R Wright; T A Meyer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-20

3.  Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Deborah J Colesa; Sheena Hembrador; Stephen Y Kang; John C Middlebrooks; Yehoash Raphael; Gina L Su
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

5.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Excitation Patterns of Standard and Steered Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Wu; Xin Luo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

7.  Interaural comparison of spiral ganglion cell counts in profound deafness.

Authors:  Mohammad Seyyedi; Donald K Eddington; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

9.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ganglion cell and 'dendrite' populations in electric acoustic stimulation ears.

Authors:  Helge Rask-Andersen; Wei Liu; Fred Linthicum
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.