PURPOSE: To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch computed tomography angiography(CTA) of the aortic valve-aortic root complex with and without prospective ECG-gating compared to a retrospectively ECG-gated standard-pitch acquisition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 patients (mean age 68±13 years) were examined using a 128-slice dual-source CT system using prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch (group A; n=40), non-ECG-gated high-pitch (group B; n=40) or retrospectively ECG-gated standard-pitch (C; n=40) acquisition techniques. Image quality of the aortic root, valve and ascending aorta including the coronary ostia was assessed by two independent readers. Image noise was measured, radiation dose estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was good(κ=0.64-0.78). Image quality was diagnostic in 38/40 patients (group A), 37/40(B) and 38/40(C) with no significant difference in number of patients with diagnostic image quality among all groups (p=0.56). Significantly more patients showed excellent image quality in group A compared to groups B and C (each, p<0.01). Average image noise was significantly different between all groups (p<0.05). Mean radiation dose estimates in groups A and B (each; 2.4±0.3 mSv) were significantly lower compared to group C (17.5±4.4 mSv; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: High-pitch dual-source CTA provides diagnostic image quality of the aortic valve-aortic root complex even without ECG-gating at 86% less radiation dose when compared to a standard-pitch ECG-gated acquisition.
PURPOSE: To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch computed tomography angiography(CTA) of the aortic valve-aortic root complex with and without prospective ECG-gating compared to a retrospectively ECG-gated standard-pitch acquisition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 patients (mean age 68±13 years) were examined using a 128-slice dual-source CT system using prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch (group A; n=40), non-ECG-gated high-pitch (group B; n=40) or retrospectively ECG-gated standard-pitch (C; n=40) acquisition techniques. Image quality of the aortic root, valve and ascending aorta including the coronary ostia was assessed by two independent readers. Image noise was measured, radiation dose estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was good(κ=0.64-0.78). Image quality was diagnostic in 38/40 patients (group A), 37/40(B) and 38/40(C) with no significant difference in number of patients with diagnostic image quality among all groups (p=0.56). Significantly more patients showed excellent image quality in group A compared to groups B and C (each, p<0.01). Average image noise was significantly different between all groups (p<0.05). Mean radiation dose estimates in groups A and B (each; 2.4±0.3 mSv) were significantly lower compared to group C (17.5±4.4 mSv; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: High-pitch dual-source CTA provides diagnostic image quality of the aortic valve-aortic root complex even without ECG-gating at 86% less radiation dose when compared to a standard-pitch ECG-gated acquisition.
Authors: Justus E Roos; Jürgen K Willmann; Dominik Weishaupt; Mario Lachat; Borut Marincek; Paul R Hilfiker Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Paul Stolzmann; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Tobias Krauss; Lotus Desbiolles; André Plass; Michele Genoni; Thomas G Flohr; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael Lell; Fabian Hinkmann; Katharina Anders; Paul Deak; Willi A Kalender; Michael Uder; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Wieland H Sommer; Jan C Schenzle; Christoph R Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Anno Graser; Gisela Michalski; Klement Neumaier; Maximilian F Reiser; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Robert Goetti; Stephan Baumüller; Gudrun Feuchtner; Paul Stolzmann; Christoph Karlo; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Sebastian Leschka; Paul Stolzmann; Lotus Desbiolles; Stephan Baumueller; Robert Goetti; Thomas Schertler; Hans Scheffel; Andre Plass; Volkmar Falk; Gudrun Feuchtner; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Alexander Becker; Alexander W Leber; Carsten Rist; Bernd J Wintersperger; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-11-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thomas Schertler; Hans Scheffel; Thomas Frauenfelder; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Paul Stolzmann; Burkhardt Seifert; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-09-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: W Wuest; K Anders; A Schuhbaeck; M S May; S Gauss; M Marwan; M Arnold; S Ensminger; G Muschiol; W G Daniel; M Uder; S Achenbach Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martin Beeres; Boris Schell; Aristidis Mastragelopoulos; Eva Herrmann; Josef Matthias Kerl; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Clara Lee; Petra Siebenhandl; Boris Bodelle; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl; Volkmar Jacobi; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martin Beeres; Andreas M Bucher; Julian L Wichmann; Claudia Frellesen; Jan E Scholtz; Moritz Albrecht; Boris Bodelle; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Clara Lee; Moritz Kaup; Thomas J Vogl; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: A Korn; M Fenchel; B Bender; S Danz; C Thomas; D Ketelsen; C D Claussen; G Moonis; B Krauss; M Heuschmid; U Ernemann; H Brodoefel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Alice Wielandner; Dietrich Beitzke; Ruediger Schernthaner; Florian Wolf; Christina Langenberger; Alfred Stadler; Christian Loewe Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Bernhard Bischoff; Felix G Meinel; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Christoph Becker Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 2.357