INTRODUCTION: High-pitch CT angiography (CTA) is a recent innovation that allows significant shortening of scan time with volume coverage of 43 mm per second. The aim of our study was to assess this technique in CTA of the head and neck. METHODS: CTA of supra-aortic arteries was performed in 50 patients using two acquisition protocols: conventional single-source 64-slice (pitch 1.2) and high-pitch dual-source 128-slice CT (pitch 3.2). Subjective and objective image quality of supra-aortic vessel ostia as well as intra- and extra-cranial segments was retrospectively assessed by blinded readers and radiation dose compared between the two protocols. RESULTS: Conventional and high-pitch CTA achieved comparable signal-to-noise ratios in arterial (54.3 ± 16.5 versus 57.3 ± 14.8; p = 0.50) and venous segments (15.8 ± 6.7 versus 18.9 ± 8.9; p = 0.21). High-pitch scanning was, however, associated with sharper delineation of vessel contours and image quality significantly improved at the level of supra-aortic vessel ostia (p < 0.0001) as well as along the brachiocephalic trunk (p < 0.0001), the subclavian arteries (p < 0.0001), proximal common carotid arteries (p = 0.01), and vertebral V1 segments (p < 0.0001). Using the high-pitch mode, the dose-length product was reduced by about 35% (218.2 ± 30 versus 141.8 ± 20 mGy × cm). CONCLUSIONS: Due to elimination of transmitted cardiac motion, high-pitch CTA of the neck improves image quality in the proximity of the aortic arch while significantly lowering radiation dose. The technique thus qualifies as a promising alternative to conventional spiral CTA and may be particularly useful for identification of ostial stenosis.
INTRODUCTION: High-pitch CT angiography (CTA) is a recent innovation that allows significant shortening of scan time with volume coverage of 43 mm per second. The aim of our study was to assess this technique in CTA of the head and neck. METHODS: CTA of supra-aortic arteries was performed in 50 patients using two acquisition protocols: conventional single-source 64-slice (pitch 1.2) and high-pitch dual-source 128-slice CT (pitch 3.2). Subjective and objective image quality of supra-aortic vessel ostia as well as intra- and extra-cranial segments was retrospectively assessed by blinded readers and radiation dose compared between the two protocols. RESULTS: Conventional and high-pitch CTA achieved comparable signal-to-noise ratios in arterial (54.3 ± 16.5 versus 57.3 ± 14.8; p = 0.50) and venous segments (15.8 ± 6.7 versus 18.9 ± 8.9; p = 0.21). High-pitch scanning was, however, associated with sharper delineation of vessel contours and image quality significantly improved at the level of supra-aortic vessel ostia (p < 0.0001) as well as along the brachiocephalic trunk (p < 0.0001), the subclavian arteries (p < 0.0001), proximal common carotid arteries (p = 0.01), and vertebral V1 segments (p < 0.0001). Using the high-pitch mode, the dose-length product was reduced by about 35% (218.2 ± 30 versus 141.8 ± 20 mGy × cm). CONCLUSIONS: Due to elimination of transmitted cardiac motion, high-pitch CTA of the neck improves image quality in the proximity of the aortic arch while significantly lowering radiation dose. The technique thus qualifies as a promising alternative to conventional spiral CTA and may be particularly useful for identification of ostial stenosis.
Authors: Mouhammad Jumaa; Alexandra Popescu; Jawad Tsay; Christina Vaughan; Nirav Vora; Brian Jankowitz; Michael B Horowitz; Tudor G Jovin; Ken Uchino Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Tobias De Zordo; Klemens von Lutterotti; Christian Dejaco; Peter F Soegner; Renate Frank; Friedrich Aigner; Andrea S Klauser; Christoph Pechlaner; U Joseph Schoepf; Werner R Jaschke; Gudrun M Feuchtner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Compter; H B van der Worp; W J Schonewille; J A Vos; A Algra; T H Lo; W P Th M Mali; F L Moll; L J Kappelle Journal: Trials Date: 2008-11-24 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Matthias S May; Manuel R Kramer; Achim Eller; Wolfgang Wuest; Michael Scharf; Michael Brand; Marc Saake; Bernhard Schmidt; Michael Uder; Michael M Lell Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Dietrich Beitzke; Richard Nolz; Sylvia Unterhumer; Christina Plank; Michael Weber; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Veronika Schöpf; Florian Wolf; Christian Loewe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 3.240