PURPOSE: To evaluate intra- and interfraction variability of tumor and lung volume and position using a hybrid active breath-hold gating technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 159 repeat normal inspiration active breath-hold CTs were acquired weekly during radiotherapy for 9 lung cancer patients (12-21 scans per patient). A physician delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV), lungs, and spinal cord on the first breath-hold CT, and contours were propagated semiautomatically. Intra- and interfraction variability of tumor and lung position and volume were evaluated. Tumor centroid and border variability were quantified. RESULTS: On average, intrafraction variability of lung and GTV centroid position was <2.0 mm. Interfraction population variability was 3.6-6.7 mm (systematic) and 3.1-3.9 mm (random) for the GTV centroid and 1.0-3.3 mm (systematic) and 1.5-2.6 mm (random) for the lungs. Tumor volume regressed 44.6% +/- 23.2%. Gross tumor volume border variability was patient specific and demonstrated anisotropic shape change in some subjects. Interfraction GTV positional variability was associated with tumor volume regression and contralateral lung volume (p < 0.05). Inter-breath-hold reproducibility was unaffected by time point in the treatment course (p > 0.1). Increases in free-breathing tidal volume were associated with increases in breath-hold ipsilateral lung volume (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The breath-hold technique was reproducible within 2 mm during each fraction. Interfraction variability of GTV position and shape was substantial because of tumor volume and breath-hold lung volume change during therapy. These results support the feasibility of a hybrid breath-hold gating technique and suggest that online image guidance would be beneficial. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To evaluate intra- and interfraction variability of tumor and lung volume and position using a hybrid active breath-hold gating technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 159 repeat normal inspiration active breath-hold CTs were acquired weekly during radiotherapy for 9 lung cancerpatients (12-21 scans per patient). A physician delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV), lungs, and spinal cord on the first breath-hold CT, and contours were propagated semiautomatically. Intra- and interfraction variability of tumor and lung position and volume were evaluated. Tumor centroid and border variability were quantified. RESULTS: On average, intrafraction variability of lung and GTV centroid position was <2.0 mm. Interfraction population variability was 3.6-6.7 mm (systematic) and 3.1-3.9 mm (random) for the GTV centroid and 1.0-3.3 mm (systematic) and 1.5-2.6 mm (random) for the lungs. Tumor volume regressed 44.6% +/- 23.2%. Gross tumor volume border variability was patient specific and demonstrated anisotropic shape change in some subjects. Interfraction GTV positional variability was associated with tumor volume regression and contralateral lung volume (p < 0.05). Inter-breath-hold reproducibility was unaffected by time point in the treatment course (p > 0.1). Increases in free-breathing tidal volume were associated with increases in breath-hold ipsilateral lung volume (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The breath-hold technique was reproducible within 2 mm during each fraction. Interfraction variability of GTV position and shape was substantial because of tumor volume and breath-hold lung volume change during therapy. These results support the feasibility of a hybrid breath-hold gating technique and suggest that online image guidance would be beneficial. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: J W Wong; M B Sharpe; D A Jaffray; V R Kini; J M Robertson; J S Stromberg; A A Martinez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Vincent M Remouchamps; Nicola Letts; Di Yan; Frank A Vicini; Michel Moreau; Julie A Zielinski; Jian Liang; Larry L Kestin; Alvaro A Martinez; John W Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sara C Erridge; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Sara H Muller; Marcel van Herk; Katrien De Jaeger; José S A Belderbos; Liesbeth J Boersma; Joos V Lebesque Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Gig S Mageras; Alex Pevsner; Ellen D Yorke; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Eric C Ford; Agung Hertanto; Steven M Larson; D Michael Lovelock; Yusuf E Erdi; Sadek A Nehmeh; John L Humm; C Clifton Ling Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Elisabeth Weiss; Scott P Robertson; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Geoffrey D Hugo Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 7.038