Nuzhat Jan1, Salim Balik1, Geoffrey D Hugo1, Nitai Mukhopadhyay2, Elisabeth Weiss3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. Electronic address: eweiss@mcvh-vcu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze primary tumor (PT) and lymph node (LN) position changes relative to each other and relative to anatomic landmarks during conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 12 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer PT, LN, carina, and 1 thoracic vertebra were manually contoured on weekly 4-dimensional fan-beam CT scans. Systematic and random interfraction displacements of all contoured structures were identified in the 3 cardinal directions, and resulting setup margins were calculated. Time trends and the effect of volume changes on displacements were analyzed. RESULTS: Three-dimensional displacement vectors and systematic/random interfraction displacements were smaller for carina than for vertebra both for PT and LN. For PT, mean (SD) 3-dimensional displacement vectors with carina-based alignment were 7 (4) mm versus 9 (5) mm with bony anatomy (P<.0001). For LN, smaller displacements were found with carina- (5 [3] mm, P<.0001) and vertebra-based (6 [3] mm, P=.002) alignment compared with using PT for setup (8 [5] mm). Primary tumor and LN displacements relative to bone and carina were independent (P>.05). Displacements between PT and bone (P=.04) and between PT and LN (P=.01) were significantly correlated with PT volume regression. Displacements between LN and carina were correlated with LN volume change (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Carina-based setup results in a more reproducible PT and LN alignment than bony anatomy setup. Considering the independence of PT and LN displacement and the impact of volume regression on displacements over time, repeated CT imaging even with PT-based alignment is recommended in locally advanced disease.
PURPOSE: To analyze primary tumor (PT) and lymph node (LN) position changes relative to each other and relative to anatomic landmarks during conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 12 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancerPT, LN, carina, and 1 thoracic vertebra were manually contoured on weekly 4-dimensional fan-beam CT scans. Systematic and random interfraction displacements of all contoured structures were identified in the 3 cardinal directions, and resulting setup margins were calculated. Time trends and the effect of volume changes on displacements were analyzed. RESULTS: Three-dimensional displacement vectors and systematic/random interfraction displacements were smaller for carina than for vertebra both for PT and LN. For PT, mean (SD) 3-dimensional displacement vectors with carina-based alignment were 7 (4) mm versus 9 (5) mm with bony anatomy (P<.0001). For LN, smaller displacements were found with carina- (5 [3] mm, P<.0001) and vertebra-based (6 [3] mm, P=.002) alignment compared with using PT for setup (8 [5] mm). Primary tumor and LN displacements relative to bone and carina were independent (P>.05). Displacements between PT and bone (P=.04) and between PT and LN (P=.01) were significantly correlated with PT volume regression. Displacements between LN and carina were correlated with LN volume change (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Carina-based setup results in a more reproducible PT and LN alignment than bony anatomy setup. Considering the independence of PT and LN displacement and the impact of volume regression on displacements over time, repeated CT imaging even with PT-based alignment is recommended in locally advanced disease.
Authors: Jane Higgins; Andrea Bezjak; Kevin Franks; Lisa W Le; B C Cho; David Payne; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nicholas O Roman; Wes Shepherd; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Geoffrey D Hugo; Elisabeth Weiss Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Elisabeth Weiss; Scott P Robertson; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Geoffrey D Hugo Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Caroline Lavoie; Jane Higgins; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Lisa W Le; Alexander Sun; Anthony Brade; Andrew Hope; John Cho; Andrea Bezjak Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christopher Nelson; Peter Balter; Rodolfo C Morice; Kara Bucci; Lei Dong; Susan Tucker; Sastry Vedam; Joe Y Chang; George Starkschall Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kristin J Redmond; Danny Y Song; Jana L Fox; Jessica Zhou; C Nicole Rosenzweig; Eric Ford Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Trine Juhler-Nøttrup; Stine S Korreman; Anders N Pedersen; Gitte F Persson; Lasse R Aarup; Håkan Nyström; Mikael Olsen; Nikolai Tarnavski; Lena Specht Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Jonathan G Thomas; Rojano Kashani; James M Balter; Daniel Tatro; Feng-Ming Kong; Charlie C Pan Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 1.482
Authors: Hannah Bainbridge; Ahmed Salem; Rob H N Tijssen; Michael Dubec; Andreas Wetscherek; Corinne Van Es; Jose Belderbos; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Fiona McDonald Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-12
Authors: Geoffrey D Hugo; Elisabeth Weiss; William C Sleeman; Salim Balik; Paul J Keall; Jun Lu; Jeffrey F Williamson Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.071