PURPOSE: To estimate errors in soft tissue-based image guidance due to relative changes between primary tumor (PT) and affected lymph node (LN) position and volume, and to compare the results with bony anatomy-based displacements of PTs and LNs during radiotherapy of lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Weekly repeated breath-hold computed tomography scans were acquired in 17 lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. PTs and affected LNs were manually contoured on all scans after rigid registration. Interfraction and intrafraction displacements in the centers of mass of PTs and LNs relative to bone, as well as LNs relative to PTs (LN-PT), were calculated. RESULTS: The mean volume after 5 weeks was 65% for PTs and 63% for LNs. Systematic and random interfraction displacements were 2.6 to 4.6 mm and 2.7 to 2.9 mm, respectively, for PTs; 2.4 to 3.8 mm and 1.4 to 2.7 mm, respectively, for LNs; and 2.3 to 3.9 mm and 1.9 to 2.8 mm, respectively, for LN-PT. Systematic and random intrafraction displacements were less than 1 mm except in the superoinferior direction. Interfraction LN-PT displacements greater than 3 mm were observed in 67% of fractions and require a safety margin of 12 mm in the lateral direction, 11 mm in the anteroposterior direction, and 9 mm in the superoinferior direction. LN-PT displacements displayed significant time trends (p < 0.0001) and depended on the presence of pathoanatomic conditions of the ipsilateral lung, such as atelectasis. CONCLUSION: Interfraction LN-PT displacements were mostly systematic and comparable to bony anatomy-based displacements of PTs or LNs alone. Time trends, large volume changes, and the influence of pathoanatomic conditions underline the importance of soft tissue-based image guidance and the potential of plan adaptation. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To estimate errors in soft tissue-based image guidance due to relative changes between primary tumor (PT) and affected lymph node (LN) position and volume, and to compare the results with bony anatomy-based displacements of PTs and LNs during radiotherapy of lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Weekly repeated breath-hold computed tomography scans were acquired in 17 lung cancerpatients undergoing radiotherapy. PTs and affected LNs were manually contoured on all scans after rigid registration. Interfraction and intrafraction displacements in the centers of mass of PTs and LNs relative to bone, as well as LNs relative to PTs (LN-PT), were calculated. RESULTS: The mean volume after 5 weeks was 65% for PTs and 63% for LNs. Systematic and random interfraction displacements were 2.6 to 4.6 mm and 2.7 to 2.9 mm, respectively, for PTs; 2.4 to 3.8 mm and 1.4 to 2.7 mm, respectively, for LNs; and 2.3 to 3.9 mm and 1.9 to 2.8 mm, respectively, for LN-PT. Systematic and random intrafraction displacements were less than 1 mm except in the superoinferior direction. Interfraction LN-PT displacements greater than 3 mm were observed in 67% of fractions and require a safety margin of 12 mm in the lateral direction, 11 mm in the anteroposterior direction, and 9 mm in the superoinferior direction. LN-PT displacements displayed significant time trends (p < 0.0001) and depended on the presence of pathoanatomic conditions of the ipsilateral lung, such as atelectasis. CONCLUSION: Interfraction LN-PT displacements were mostly systematic and comparable to bony anatomy-based displacements of PTs or LNs alone. Time trends, large volume changes, and the influence of pathoanatomic conditions underline the importance of soft tissue-based image guidance and the potential of plan adaptation. Copyright Â
Authors: Anna H M Piet; Frank J Lagerwaard; Peter W A Kunst; John R van Sörnsen de Koste; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan Journal: Chest Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Trine Juhler-Nøttrup; Stine S Korreman; Anders N Pedersen; Gitte F Persson; Lasse R Aarup; Håkan Nyström; Mikael Olsen; Nikolai Tarnavski; Lena Specht Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Eric D Donnelly; Parag J Parikh; Wei Lu; Tianyu Zhao; Kristen Lechleiter; Michelle Nystrom; James P Hubenschmidt; Daniel A Low; Jeffrey D Bradley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jonathan G Thomas; Rojano Kashani; James M Balter; Daniel Tatro; Feng-Ming Kong; Charlie C Pan Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 1.482
Authors: Niki Panakis; Helen A McNair; Judith A Christian; Ruheena Mendes; J Richard N Symonds-Tayler; Clifford Knowles; Philip M Evans; James Bedford; Michael Brada Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Mirjana Josipovic; Marianne C Aznar; Jakob B Thomsen; Jonas Scherman; Sidsel Ms Damkjaer; Lotte Nygård; Lena Specht; Mette Pøhl; Gitte F Persson Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Renming Zhong; Jin Wang; Lin Zhou; Feng Xu; Li Liu; Jidan Zhou; Xiaoqin Jiang; Nianyong Chen; Sen Bai; You Lu Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Lan Lu; Claudiu Diaconu; Toufik Djemil; Gregory Mm Videtic; May Abdel-Wahab; Naichang Yu; John Greskovich; Kevin L Stephans; Ping Xia Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 2.102