Literature DB >> 10863086

The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

M van Herk1, P Remeijer, C Rasch, J V Lebesque.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide an analytical description of the effect of random and systematic geometrical deviations on the target dose in radiotherapy and to derive margin rules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The cumulative dose distribution delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV) is expressed analytically. Geometrical deviations are separated into treatment execution (random) and treatment preparation (systematic) variations. The analysis relates each possible preparation (systematic) error to the dose distribution over the CTV and allows computation of the probability distribution of, for instance, the minimum dose delivered to the CTV.
RESULTS: The probability distributions of the cumulative dose over a population of patients are called dose-population histograms in short. Large execution (random) variations lead to CTV underdosage for a large number of patients, while the same level of preparation (systematic) errors leads to a much larger underdosage for some of the patients. A single point on the histogram gives a simple "margin recipe." For example, to ensure a minimum dose to the CTV of 95% for 90% of the patients, a margin between CTV and planning target volume (PTV) is required of 2.5 times the total standard deviation (SD) of preparation (systematic) errors (Sigma) plus 1.64 times the total SD of execution (random) errors (sigma') combined with the penumbra width, minus 1.64 times the SD describing the penumbra width (sigma(p)). For a sigma(p) of 3.2 mm, this recipe can be simplified to 2.5 Sigma + 0.7 sigma'. Because this margin excludes rotational errors and shape deviations, it must be considered as a lower limit for safe radiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Dose-population histograms provide insight into the effects of geometrical deviations on a population of patients. Using a dose-probability based approach, simple algorithms for choosing margins were derived.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10863086     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00518-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  319 in total

1.  Positioning accuracy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy patients determined by on-treatment cone-beam CT imaging.

Authors:  N D Richmond; K E Pilling; C Peedell; D Shakespeare; C P Walker
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Localization accuracy from automatic and semi-automatic rigid registration of locally-advanced lung cancer targets during image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Scott P Robertson; Elisabeth Weiss; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Uncertainties and CTV to PTV margins quantitative assessment using cone-beam CT technique in clinical application for prostate, and head and neck irradiation tumours.

Authors:  X J Juan-Senabre; J López-Tarjuelo; A Conde-Moreno; A Santos-Serra; A L Sánchez-Iglesias; J D Quirós-Higueras; N de Marco Blancas; S Calzada-Feliu; C Ferrer-Albiach
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Consideration of the likely benefit from implementation of prostate image-guided radiotherapy using current margin sizes: a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  G S J Tudor; Y L Rimmer; T B Nguyen; M A Cowen; S J Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Electronic portal imaging vs kilovoltage imaging in fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of set-up uncertainties.

Authors:  S Gill; J Thomas; C Fox; T Kron; A Thompson; S Chander; S Williams; K H Tai; G Duchesne; F Foroudi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A geodesic deformable model for automatic segmentation of image sequences applied to radiation therapy.

Authors:  G Bueno; O Déniz; J Salido; C Carrascosa; J M Delgado
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A simulation technique for computation of the dosimetric effects of setup, organ motion and delineation uncertainties in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bongile Mzenda; Mir Hosseini-Ashrafi; Antony Palmer; Honghai Liu; David J Brown
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Quality of patient positioning during cerebral tomotherapy irradiation using different mask systems.

Authors:  C Leitzen; T Wilhelm-Buchstab; S Garbe; C Lütter; T Müdder; B Simon; H H Schild; H Schüller
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Evaluation of internal target volume in patients undergoing image-guided intensity modulated adjuvant radiation for gastric cancers.

Authors:  A Aggarwal; S Chopra; S N Paul; R Engineer; S K Srivastava
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Tumor bed radiotherapy in women following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer-safety margin with/without image guidance.

Authors:  Ales Hlavka; Jaroslav Vanasek; Karel Odrazka; Jan Stuk; Martin Dolezel; Vit Ulrych; Martina Vitkova; Jiri Mynarik; Iveta Kolarova; Zdenka Vilasova
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.