Literature DB >> 20495801

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Ernst Sendtner1, Tibor Schuster, Michael Wörner, Thomas Kalteis, Joachim Grifka, Tobias Renkawitz.   

Abstract

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7-50.6°; SD ± 3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0-33.3°; SD ± 6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6-50.2°; SD ± 6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6-46.9°; SD ± 10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and -5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20495801      PMCID: PMC3103965          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1042-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation.

Authors:  Richard L Wixson; Margot A MacDonald
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?

Authors:  T Kalteis; M Handel; H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

Review 3.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Thomas Ybinger; Wolfgang Kumpan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Zhinian Wan; William T Long; Michael Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Error in acetabular socket alignment due to the thick anterior pelvic soft tissues.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Manish Dastane; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Computer-assisted total hip navigation.

Authors:  Richard L Wixson
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2008

9.  The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation.

Authors:  Jürgen W Babisch; Frank Layher; Louis-Philippe Amiot
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The use of ultrasound in acquisition of the anterior pelvic plane in computer-assisted total hip replacement: a cadaver study.

Authors:  S Parratte; P Kilian; V Pauly; P Champsaur; J-N A Argenson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-02
View more
  25 in total

1.  [Principles and new concepts in computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Renkawitz; M Wörner; E Sendtner; M Weber; P Lechler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Alexander S McLawhorn; Kaitlin M Carroll; Benjamin A McArthur; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-19

3.  Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Chi-Lung Chen; Sara Low; Wei-Ming Lin; Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu; Fabio R Orozco; Alvin C Ong; Zachary D Post
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-19

4.  New method for measuring acetabular component positioning with EOS imaging: feasibility study on dry bone.

Authors:  Alexandre Journé; Jérome Sadaka; Claire Bélicourt; Alain Sautet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  CORR Insights™: Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Evidence-based computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Li; Jun Jia; Qiang Wu; Guang-Zhi Ning; Qiu-Li Wu; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-16

7.  Navigation is Equal to Estimation by Eye and Palpation in Preventing Psoas Impingement in THA.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benedikt Messmer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakahara; Takayuki Kyo; Yasuo Kuroda; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  A novel non-invasive mechanical technique of cup and stem placement and leg length adjustment in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Takashi Murayama; Hideo Ohnishi; Toshiharu Mori; Yuichi Okazaki; Kenji Sujita; Akinori Sakai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device.

Authors:  Ivan Jacob; Jessica Benson; Kate Shanaghan; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.