Literature DB >> 17661035

Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation.

Thomas Ybinger1, Wolfgang Kumpan.   

Abstract

Optimal positioning of the acetabular component improves the long-term success of total hip arthroplasty by reducing the rate of adverse outcomes, such as component wear and dislocation. Mechanical guides designed to facilitate proper component orientation are inadequate, as they do not account for variations in patient position and pelvic motion during surgery. Pioneering image-guided surgical navigation systems were developed to provide surgeons with improved methods for intraoperatively measuring orientation and alignment. Although enhanced orientation has been reported with such systems, they require preoperative CT scans and are therefore limited by the need for preplanning, the necessity of matching CT data with the actual patient position, and the additional costs associated with CT. The recent development of CT-free navigational tools addresses these disadvantages and offers real-time surgical feedback regarding the actual position of the acetabular component and instruments relative to the pelvis. Proper training and enhanced identification of bony landmarks will improve upon the success of these systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661035      PMCID: PMC2267520          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0430-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  16 in total

1.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Widmer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Yuji Hishiki; Zhinian Wan; Deanne Newton; Andrew Yun
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

4.  Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; L G Watson; D Cassidy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; G Watson; A T Dolovich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration.

Authors:  J G Kennedy; W B Rogers; K E Soffe; R J Sullivan; D G Griffen; L J Sheehan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Image-based hip navigation.

Authors:  Andreas Wentzensen; Guoyan Zheng; Bernd Vock; Ulrich Langlotz; Jürgen Korber; Lutz P Nolte; Paul A Grützner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Dislocation following total hip replacement.

Authors:  M A Ali Khan; P H Brakenbury; I S Reynolds
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981

10.  Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement.

Authors:  B Jaramaz; A M DiGioia; M Blackwell; C Nikou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Dirk Crucius; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Intra- and intersurgeon variability in image-free navigation system for THA.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ohashi; Masanori Matsuura; Yusaku Okamoto; Yoshiaki Okajima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.

Authors:  Chris Bailey; Rehan Gul; Mark Falworth; Steven Zadow; Roger Oakeshott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; David Anderson; Scott Foster; Matthew Beal; Jo Ann Lee; Christopher Barr; Henrik Malchau; Joseph McCarthy; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kaku; Hiroaki Tagomori; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-04-12

8.  Initial Results of an Acetabular Center Axis Registration Technique in Navigated Hip Arthroplasty with Deformed Acetabular Rims.

Authors:  Hiroshi Wada; Hajime Mishima; Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Hisashi Sugaya; Tomofumi Nishino; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-03-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.