Literature DB >> 23344848

CORR Insights™: Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Rocco P Pitto1.   

Abstract

This CORR Insights™ is a commentary on the article "Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis" by Joseph T. Moskal MD and Susan G. Capps PhD available at DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5 .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344848      PMCID: PMC3586022          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2795-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Total hip replacement and the law of diminishing returns.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [The minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A review of the literature].

Authors:  A Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R J K Khan; D Maor; M Hofmann; S Haebich
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-01

6.  Functional recovery, complications and CT positioning of total hip replacement performed through a Röttinger anterolateral mini-incision. Review of a continuous series of 103 cases.

Authors:  C Mandereau; V Brzakala; J Matsoukis
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA.

Authors:  Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; R Michael Meneghini; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Mark W Pagnano; Krista Coleman Wood; R Michael Meneghini; Kenton Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jon H M Goosen; Boudewijn J Kollen; René M Castelein; Bart M Kuipers; Cees C Verheyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chang-Peng Xu; Xue Li; Jin-Qi Song; Zhuang Cui; Bin Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.