Literature DB >> 31965312

Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device.

Ivan Jacob1, Jessica Benson2, Kate Shanaghan1, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) relying on registration of the anterior pelvic plane (APP) allows precise acetabular component placement. We determined the variability of cup placement in patients who underwent THA with and without the use of CAS that does not rely on the registration of APP.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients who underwent staged-bilateral THAs, one without CAS (control), and a subsequent one with CAS (study group), were included. Acetabular inclination and anteversion were measured on standardized post-operative radiographs. Variance in cup position and Lewinnek's zone proportionality were compared between the groups. Multiple regressions were performed to identify factors affecting variability in acetabular component placement.
RESULTS: The mean inclination for the control and study group was 42.7° (SD 4.5) and 42.5° (SD 2.9), respectively. The inclination variance was 20.5° and 8.2° respectively (p = < 0.001). Cup inclination was more consistent in the study than in the control group (deviation from the mean: 2.3° vs. 3.8°, p < 0.001). The mean anteversion for the control and the study group was 25.5° (SD 7.4) and 26.8° (SD 4.3), respectively. The anteversion variance was 54.2° and 18.2° respectively (p = <0.001). Consistency in cup anteversion was significantly improved with CAS (deviation from the mean: 3.4° vs. 5.8°; p = 0.002). Lewinnek's zone proportionality was not affected by the use of  CAS. In the linear regression analysis, CAS significantly increased consistency in cup inclination (p = 0.01). Patient's factors including BMI and laterality affected consistency of cup placement.
CONCLUSION: CAS without referencing the APP allows a more consistent orientation of the acetabular component when compared to freehand placement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior pelvic plane; Computer-assisted surgery; Cup position; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31965312     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04484-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  38 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Richard Lass; Bernd Kubista; Boris Olischar; Sophie Frantal; Reinhard Windhager; Alexander Giurea
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  A comparison between imageless navigated and manual freehand technique acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Adam Bryant; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; G Watson; A T Dolovich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  A new method of registration in navigated hip arthroplasty without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane.

Authors:  Edward T Davis; Mario Schubert; Melanie Wegner; Martin Haimerl
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?

Authors:  Eli Kamara; Jonathon Robinson; Marcel A Bas; Jose A Rodriguez; Matthew S Hepinstall
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Changes in acetabular orientation during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D T Schloemann; A I Edelstein; R L Barrack
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  Farid Amirouche; Giovanni F Solitro; Amit Walia; Mark Gonzalez; Aimee Bobko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Pelvic pitch and roll during total hip arthroplasty performed through a posterolateral approach. A potential source of error in free-hand cup positioning.

Authors:  Alejando Gonzalez Della Valle; Kate Shanaghan; Jessica R Benson; Kaitlin Carroll; Michael Cross; Alexander McLawhorn; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A new technique to improve cup inclination accuracy in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Gonzalez Della Valle; B Beksac; M G E Peterson; E A Salvati
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of a novel imageless navigation system reduced fluoroscopy exposure and improved acetabular positioning in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Christian B Ong; Yu-Fen Chiu; Ajay Premkumar; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Computer-Assisted Navigation for Complex Revision of Unstable Total Hip Replacement in a Patient With Post-traumatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Kelsey A Rankin; Logan Petit; Adam Nasreddine; Phil Minotti; Michael Leslie; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.