Literature DB >> 23589032

Evidence-based computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu-Lin Li1, Jun Jia, Qiang Wu, Guang-Zhi Ning, Qiu-Li Wu, Shi-Qing Feng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has evolved over the years to be a reliable, reproducible, and successful orthopedic procedure. Nowadays, THA is increasingly performed on patients using less invasive, tissue-preserving techniques. Accordingly, the use of computer navigation in total joint arthroplasty has become more prevalent. However, there is still lack of high-quality evidence to verify the most effective technique for THA.
METHODS: A search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases. Clinical trials published from 1966 to Feb 2012 that assess conventional techniques THA or computer-navigated techniques THA for placing the acetabular component. The main outcome measures included abduction angles, anteversion angles, percentage of acetabular outliers, operation time, decrease in Hb/24 h, and wound secretion/48 h.
RESULTS: The pooled analysis across all studies showed a significant difference in anteversion angles and acetabular outliers (difference -0.22, 95% CI -0.67, 0.24; p = 0.346, I (2) = 71.9%) and (difference 8.34, 95% CI 4.15, 16.74; p = 0.000, I (2) = 0.0%). However, no significant difference in abduction angle and decrease in Hb/24 h (difference -0.22, 95% CI -0.67, 0.24; p = 0.346, I (2) = 71.9%) and (difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.36, 0.41; p = 0.888, I (2) = 0.0%). For the operation time, computer-navigated THA was longer (difference -0.73, 95% CI -1.32, -0.15; p = 0.014, I (2) = 74.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated computer-navigated THA was a more favorable method for placing the acetabular component and decreased the number of acetabular cups implanted outside the desired range of alignment. More high-quality RCTs were needed to support the evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589032     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1222-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  16 in total

1.  Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  T Leenders; D Vandevelde; G Mahieu; R Nuyts
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2002

2.  Limitations of imageless computer-assisted navigation for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fang Lin; Dohyung Lim; Richard L Wixson; Steven Milos; Ronald W Hendrix; Mohsen Makhsous
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system.

Authors:  T Kalteis; M Handel; T Herold; L Perlick; H Baethis; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?

Authors:  T Kalteis; M Handel; H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

6.  Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique.

Authors:  M Honl; K Schwieger; M Salineros; J Jacobs; M Morlock; M Wimmer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-10

7.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; J C Albright; D D Goetz; J P Olejniczak; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  [Cup placement in hip replacement surgery -- A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty -- a multi-center study].

Authors:  G Saxler; A Marx; D Vandevelde; U Langlotz; M Tannast; M Wiese; U Michaelis; G Kemper; P A Grützner; R Steffen; M von Knoch; T Holland-Letz; K Bernsmann
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 May-Jun
View more
  10 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Spinal Fusion Is Associated With Changes in Acetabular Orientation and Reductions in Pelvic Mobility.

Authors:  Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  An Evaluation of Sensing Technologies to Measure Intraoperative Leg Length for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akash Chaurasia; Jerry Yan; Robert Li; Kate McCarren; Claire State; Hannah Takasuka; Evan Bender; Aditi Jithendra; Julius K Oni; Amir Manbachi
Journal:  Des Med Devices Conf (2020)       Date:  2020-07-27

3.  Improving Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study of an Inertial Navigation Tool and a Novel Registration Method.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Daniel Marsden-Jones; Matt Lyons; William L Walter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-11-02

4.  The accuracy of component positioning during revision total hip arthroplasty using 3D optical computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Alex Tang; Vivek Singh; Mohamad Sharan; Mackenzie A Roof; John J Mercuri; Morteza Meftah; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Minimal Increase in Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Procedural Time with the Use of a Novel Surgical Navigation Tool.

Authors:  Alexander Christ; Danielle Ponzio; Michael Pitta; Kaitlin Carroll; Jeffrey M Muir; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-09-28

6.  Trigonometric Algorithm Defining the True Three-Dimensional Acetabular Cup Orientation: Correlation Between Measured and Calculated Cup Orientation Angles.

Authors:  T E Snijders; T P C Schlösser; S M van Gaalen; R M Castelein; H Weinans; A de Gast
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-07-12

7.  Utilization of technology-assisted total hip arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2018.

Authors:  Shane Korber; Joseph K Antonios; Lakshmanan Sivasundaram; Cory K Mayfield; Hyunwoo Paco Kang; Brian C Chung; Daniel A Oakes; Nathanael D Heckmann
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-29

8.  Computer navigation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dominic Davenport; Venu Kavarthapu
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2016-07-26

Review 9.  An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence.

Authors:  Mohamed Mosaad Hasan; Manrui Zhang; Matthew Beal; Hassan M K Ghomrawi
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-01-28

10.  Novel Measure of Acetabular Cup Inclination and Anteversion During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  William L Walter; Neri A Baker; Daniel Marsden-Jones; Ameneh Sadeghpour
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-01-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.