Literature DB >> 20480405

Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: a cause of runaway wear and early failure.

William L Griffin1, Christopher J Nanson, Bryan D Springer, Matthew A Davies, Thomas K Fehring.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the clinical success of modern metal-on-metal articulations, concerns with wear-related release of metal ions persist. Evidence suggests metal ion release is related to the effective coverage of the head in the metal shell (the cup's functional articular arc). A recent study suggests a reduced functional articular arc is associated with increased ion release and the arc is a function of component design, size, and the abduction angle. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to (1) measure the functional articular arc in different sizes of currently available one-piece metal shells from several different manufacturers; and (2) compare the functional articular arc of these one-piece metal shells with the 180 masculine arc of conventional hip arthroplasty acetabular components.
METHODS: We calculated the available articular surface arc for 33 one-piece metal cups using measurements of cup depth and internal cup radius.
RESULTS: The arc of the articular surface varied among manufacturers and generally decreased with decreasing shell diameter. The mean functional articular arc was 160.5 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees (range, 151.8 degrees -165.8 degrees), which was less than the 180 degrees arc of a conventional acetabular component.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show certain cup designs are at higher risk for failure as a result of the decreased articular surface arc. This, along with analysis of abduction angles, supports the recent findings of bearing failure with vertically placed implants. Care must be taken when implanting these shells to ensure they are placed in less abduction to avoid edge loading and the potential for early bearing failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480405      PMCID: PMC2919889          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1383-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

Review 1.  Tribological principles in metal-on-metal hip joint design.

Authors:  D Dowson
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 2.  Biological effects of metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Authors:  M S Bhamra; C P Case
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear.

Authors:  D J Langton; S S Jameson; T J Joyce; N J Hallab; S Natu; A V F Nargol
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-01

4.  Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.

Authors:  B Ollivere; C Darrah; T Barker; J Nolan; M J Porteous
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

Review 5.  Metal-on-metal hip joint tribology.

Authors:  D Dowson; Z M Jin
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 6.  Biological effects of clinically relevant wear particles from metal-on-metal hip prostheses.

Authors:  C Brown; J Fisher; E Ingham
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 7.  Metal-on-metal bearings surfaces: materials, manufacture, design, optimization, and alternatives.

Authors:  G H Isaac; J Thompson; S Williams; J Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

Review 9.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience.

Authors:  Martin L Buergi; William L Walter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 10.  Why total hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  18 in total

1.  Letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Harlan Amstutz; Michel Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Edge-loading severity as a function of cup lip radius in metal-on-metal total hips--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Karen M Kruger; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Metal-on-metal: history, state of the art (2010).

Authors:  Philippe Triclot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  High prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris in small-headed ASR™ hips.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The 2014 Frank Stinchfield Award: The 'landing zone' for wear and stability in total hip arthroplasty is smaller than we thought: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Complications of metal-on-metal tribological pairing].

Authors:  M Stiehler; F Zobel; F Hannemann; J Schmitt; J Lützner; S Kirschner; K-P Günther; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Five Hundred Fifty-five Retrieved Metal-on-metal Hip Replacements of a Single Design Show a Wide Range of Wear, Surface Features, and Histopathologic Reactions.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Park; Zhen Lu; Robert S Hastings; Patricia A Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Catherine Van Der Straeten; George Grammatopoulos; Harinderjit S Gill; Alessandro Calistri; Patricia Campbell; Koen A De Smet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Which hip articulation bearing for which patient? : Tribology of the future].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; C Kaddick
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Risk of impingement and third-body abrasion with 28-mm metal-on-metal bearings.

Authors:  Ian C Clarke; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Adrien Brusson; Christina Savisaar; John G Bowsher; Michelle Burgett; Thomas K Donaldson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.