Literature DB >> 24356820

[Complications of metal-on-metal tribological pairing].

M Stiehler1, F Zobel, F Hannemann, J Schmitt, J Lützner, S Kirschner, K-P Günther, A Hartmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metal-on-metal (MoM) tribological pairing results in less volumetric abrasion than pairing with the conventionally used polyethylene and is associated with a lower risk of material failure compared to other hard-hard pairings. An increased frequency of problem cases in recent years has led to a great increase in uncertainty. Against this background in this article the current aspects of epidemiology, etiology, diagnostics and treatment of complications in MoM hip joint endoprostheses will be discussed. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ETIOLOGY: Based on the results from national endoprosthesis registers and selected clinical studies an evaluation of the rate of local complications from MoM tribological pairings was undertaken. A differentiation was made between MoM pairings in pedicled small head prostheses (≤ 32 mm), large head (> 32 mm) and surface replacement (OFE) endoprostheses. Each year MoM endoprostheses release on average 10(12)-10(14) cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) nanoparticles per patient. This release of metal ions and particles can lead to a variety of tissue reactions. DIAGNOSTICS: A differentiation must be made between regular routine diagnostics within the framework of implant follow-up screening and specific investigations due to the occurrence of complaints. The diagnostics for patients treated with MoM hip endoprostheses consists of a standardized step-wise approach considering possible differential diagnoses and the utilization of modern laboratory chemical and radiological methods. When problems occur, a differentiation should preferentially be made between complaints not caused by metal and mechanical problems (e.g. prosthesis loosening and impingement) and symptoms due to periprosthetic infections. THERAPY OF COMPLICATIONS: The normal standards for hip endoprosthetics are also valid for periprosthetic infections, fractures and other general complications. Specific measures are, however, necessary for complications due to metal-specific risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24356820     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-013-2131-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  91 in total

Review 1.  Cobalt cardiomyopathy. A report of two cases from mineral assay laboratories and a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Q Jarvis; E Hammond; R Meier; C Robinson
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1992-06

2.  Sensitivity caused by internal exposure to nickel, chrome and cobalt.

Authors:  D A Tilsley; H Rotstein
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  A J Hart; S A Sabah; A S Bandi; P Maggiore; P Tarassoli; B Sampson; J A Skinner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-10

4.  The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Catherine Van Der Straeten; George Grammatopoulos; Harinderjit S Gill; Alessandro Calistri; Patricia Campbell; Koen A De Smet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Metal sensitivity in patients with joint replacement arthroplasties before and after surgery].

Authors:  C Rau; P Thomas; M Thomsen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

7.  Relationship between nickel and cobalt sensitization in hard metal workers.

Authors:  I Rystedt; T Fischer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  J Daniel; H Ziaee; A Kamali; C Pradhan; T Band; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-01

9.  Respiratory diseases in hard metal workers: an occupational hygiene study in a factory.

Authors:  Y Kusaka; K Yokoyama; Y Sera; S Yamamoto; S Sone; H Kyono; T Shirakawa; S Goto
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1986-07

10.  Characterisation of wear particles produced by metal on metal and ceramic on metal hip prostheses under standard and microseparation simulation.

Authors:  Christopher Brown; Sophie Williams; Joanne L Tipper; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 4.727

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Total hip arthroplasty in overweight osteoarthritis patients].

Authors:  M Stiehler; J Goronzy; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.