Literature DB >> 22083422

[Which hip articulation bearing for which patient? : Tribology of the future].

M M Morlock1, N Bishop, C Kaddick.   

Abstract

Replacement of the hip joint has become an exceptionally successful procedure since the inauguration of the low friction principle by Charnley. Aseptic osteolysis and joint dislocation have been addressed by the development of wear-optimized materials and the introduction of larger heads. As an increase in head diameter against polyethylene causes wear increase, larger hard-on-hard bearings were introduced, which exhibit reduced wear and reduced dislocation risk with increasing head diameter. These findings were derived from standard simulator testing, not sufficiently considering the risk of fluid film breakdown under adverse conditions, which can cause a dramatic increase in wear and friction proportional to the head diameter. Such adverse conditions can occur clinically in patients due to several factors and have caused the presently observed unexpected problems with these new designs. Standardized preclinical testing has to be viewed as a minimum requirement but certainly not as a guarantee for the clinical success of new materials and designs even if the testing is adapted to the current patient requirements, which is presently not the case. The future of tribology lies in the prevention of adverse conditions in patients, the improvement and optimized use of proven existing materials and not in the use of new materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083422     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1849-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  41 in total

1.  A squeaky reputation: the problem may be design-dependent.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Bahar Adeli; Justin C Wong; Camilo Restrepo; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Squeak in hip endoprosthesis systems: An experimental study and a numerical technique to analyze design variants.

Authors:  Cornelius Weiss; Przemyslaw Gdaniec; Norbert P Hoffmann; Arne Hothan; Gerd Huber; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The influence of component design, bearing clearance and axial load on the squeaking characteristics of ceramic hip articulations.

Authors:  Arne Hothan; Gerd Huber; Cornelius Weiss; Norbert Hoffmann; Michael Morlock
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use.

Authors:  H McKellop; S H Park; R Chiesa; P Doorn; B Lu; P Normand; P Grigoris; H Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels in four types of metal-on-metal large-diameter femoral head total hip arthroplasty: the potential influence of the adapter sleeve.

Authors:  Martin Lavigne; Etienne L Belzile; Alain Roy; François Morin; Traian Amzica; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Heather A Gawel; Jasmine D Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Peter Thomas; Burkhard Summer; Hemant Pandit; Adrian Taylor; David Beard; David W Murray; Harinderjit S Gill
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Michael Tanzer; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Supramacroparticulate polyethylene in inflammation of synovial-like interface membranes: Characterization and suggested nomenclature].

Authors:  V Krenn; F Hopf; P Thomas; M Thomsen; S Usbeck; F Boettner; S Müller; D Saberi; T Hügle; M Huber; L Scheuber; J C Hopf; J P Kretzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Endoprostheses in the elderly : Biomaterials, implant selection and fixation technique].

Authors:  M M Morlock; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Manufacturing conditioned roughness and wear of biomedical oxide ceramics for all-ceramic knee implants.

Authors:  Anke Turger; Jens Köhler; Berend Denkena; Tomas A Correa; Christoph Becher; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.819

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.