Literature DB >> 17919596

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience.

Martin L Buergi1, William L Walter.   

Abstract

In the last 10 years, resurfacing hip arthroplasty has become a popular option again for treating hip disorders in younger, active patients in some parts of the world. We report the Australian experience with this operation based on the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry and the literature available on the Australian experience in Resurfacing.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17919596     DOI： 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN： 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  22 in total

1.  Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: a cause of runaway wear and early failure.

Authors:  William L Griffin; Christopher J Nanson; Bryan D Springer; Matthew A Davies; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  High cup angle and microseparation increase the wear of hip surface replacements.

Authors:  Ian J Leslie; Sophie Williams; Graham Isaac; Eileen Ingham; John Fisher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Akash Sharma; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reproducibility of radiographic assessment of femoral implant position after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Nicolas Reina; David Ancelin; Etienne Cavaignac; Laurent Maubisson; Akash Sharma; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-05

Review 6.  [Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

Authors:  M C M Klotz; S J Breusch; M Hassenpflug; R G Bitsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Does ageing Singapore need an electronic database of hip fracture patients? The value and role of a National Joint Registry and an electronic database of intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Zubin J Daruwalla; Keng L Wong; Kaamini R Pillay; Kwong M Leong; Diarmuid P Murphy
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Approach to painful hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; M Fuerst; M Schmitt-Sody
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Hip resurfacing: expectations and limitations.

Authors:  K De Smet; A Calistri
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.