Literature DB >> 17919595

Why total hip resurfacing.

Thomas P Schmalzried1.   

Abstract

Improvements in materials and fixation have addressed many of the limitations of resurfacing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The functional demands and the longevity of arthroplasty patients are increasing. Many patients have embraced the functional capacity, bone conservation, and revision options of hip resurfacing. Young men have historically been at increased risk for failure of total THA. In this patient subgroup, the survivorship of hybrid metal-metal resurfacing THA has been demonstrated to exceed that of THA, but patient selection is critical. The procedure is now also conservative on the acetabular side, and revision of the cementless acetabular component is rare. The operative parameters of femoral resurfacing revisions (conversion to a THA) are similar to that of a primary THA. Bearing technology will continue to evolve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919595     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: a cause of runaway wear and early failure.

Authors:  William L Griffin; Christopher J Nanson; Bryan D Springer; Matthew A Davies; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Michael S H Kain; Otmar Hersche; Urs Munzinger; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Biomechanical aspects of the implant fixation and kinematics of hip resurfacing systems].

Authors:  R Bader; D Klüss; L Gerdesmeyer; E Steinhauser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.